Abstract
This experiment is designed to determine the most suitable conditions and media for propagating three selected fig (Ficus carica L.) clones through tissue culture. The clone 37 displayed a higher performance than clones 50 and 82. As the multiplication medium, the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg dm-3 α-indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 1 mg dm-3 gibberellic acid and 5 mg dm-3 6-benzyladenine were the best, whereas, MS medium complemented with 1.2 and 2.5 μM IBA or 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) were better in respect to rooting. Peat followed by volcanic tuff gave the best performance for acclimatization to outdoor conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fig clone 37 outperformed clones 50 and 82.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=60)
Ficus caricat0 - Material
- clone 37e0
- Outcome
- performancee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- clones 50 and 82e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_(Ficus_carica)_-_Cagliari%2C_Italy_2024-03-26.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The clone 37 displayed a higher performance than clones 50 and 82.”
t0“Ficus carica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
MS medium with IBA, gibberellic acid and benzyladenine was best for multiplication.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg dm-3 α-indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 1 mg dm-3 gibberellic acid and 5 mg dm-3 6-benzyladeninee0
- Outcome
- multiplication mediume0
- Direction
- the beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As the multiplication medium, the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 mg dm-3 α-indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 1 mg dm-3 gibberellic acid and 5 mg dm-3 6-benzyladenine were the best”
t0“Ficus carica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
MS medium with 1.2 and 2.5 μM IBA or NAA improved rooting.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- MS medium complemented with 1.2 and 2.5 μM IBA or 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA)e0
- Outcome
- rootinge0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“MS medium complemented with 1.2 and 2.5 μM IBA or 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) were better in respect to rooting.”
t0“Ficus carica L.”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat followed by volcanic tuff gave the best fig acclimatization performance outdoors.
- Taxon
- Ficus carica L.Ficus caricat0
- Treatment
- Peat followed by volcanic tuffe0
- Outcome
- performance for acclimatizatione0
- Direction
- beste0
- Setting
- outdoor conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peat followed by volcanic tuff gave the best performance for acclimatization to outdoor conditions.”
t0“Ficus carica L.”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
24 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →in vitro · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →in vitro · pest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.