Paper · 2022 · Journal of Tropical Plant Physiology

Callus Induction of Fig (Ficus carica cv. Violette de Soillès) via Thin Cell Layer Technique

Dahmendra Sriskanda; Xuan Jia Chew; Bee Lynn Chew

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ficus carica L. is a fruit-bearing fig plant belonging to the Moraceae family. The fig fruit is known for its health benefits with high levels of fibre, vitamins, sugars and minerals. The leaves are also used for diabetes, cholesterol reduction and skin disorders. Previous reports have documented on the different in vitro callus induction methods of F. carica via plant tissue culture. Thin cell layer (TCL) has been previously established for the micropropagation of many plant species, utilising thin sections of explants in this method to induce callus. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the TCL technique in the callus induction of F. carica cv. Violette de Soillès. Stem explants with a diameter of 3.0 to 4.0 mm were excised into the thickness of approximately 0.5 to 0.8 mm and inoculated on MS media supplemented with BAP and NAA at different concentrations. The results indicated that MS media supplemented with 1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA, and 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA induced the highest amount of semi-friable callus with 100% callus induction rate. The current study reported on the induction of callus from the Violette de Soillès cultivar via TCL, which in future, can be explored for shoot organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis and cell suspension culture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA produced the highest semi-friable callus amount and 100% induction.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Treatment
1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAAe0
Outcome
semi-friable calluse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS media supplemented with 1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA, and 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA induced the highest amount of semi-friable callus with 100% callus induction rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA produced the highest semi-friable callus amount and 100% induction.

Taxon
Ficus caricaFicus caricat0
Treatment
2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAAe0
Outcome
semi-friable calluse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MS media supplemented with 1.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA, and 2.0 mg/L BAP and 0.5 mg/L NAA induced the highest amount of semi-friable callus with 100% callus induction rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fig (Ficus carica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.