Paper · 1998 · Acta Horticulturae

IN VITRO CLONING OF FICUS CARICA L. ADULT TREES

J. Nobre; A. Romano

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work reports in vitro studies carried out with two Portuguese cultivars of fig-tree: Berbera (a dried fig) and Lampa (a fresh fig). Procedures were developed to overcome difficulties associated with the establishment of adult material due to contaminants and exudation of phenolic compounds. An improved growth and development of the apical shoot-tips was obtained on Muriithi medium supplemented with 0.05 % PVP. The highest multiplication rate, 5.3 shoots per culture, every three weeks, was achieved on a similar basal medium supplemented with 2.2 mu M BA and devoid of NAA. The best rooting response (96.9 %) was observed on the medium containing 2.5 mu M IBA. Plantlets were successfully acclimatized and grown for three months in the greenhouse, and then field established for orchard production. Micropropagated plants produced fruits two years after field-establishment. These results are a promising step in the direction of in vitro cloning of valuable genotypes directly from field-grown plants and the conservation of plant genetic resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muriithi medium with 0.05 % PVP improved apical shoot-tip growth and development.

Taxon
FICUS CARICA L.t0
Organ / stage
apical shoot-tipse0
Treatment
Muriithi medium supplemented with 0.05 % PVPe0
Outcome
growth and development of the apical shoot-tipse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“FICUS CARICA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“An improved growth and development of the apical shoot-tips was obtained on Muriithi medium supplemented with 0.05 % PVP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 2.2 mu M BA and no NAA achieved the highest multiplication rate of 5.3 shoots per culture every three weeks.

Taxon
FICUS CARICA L.t0
Treatment
similar basal medium supplemented with 2.2 mu M BA and devoid of NAAe0
Outcome
multiplication ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.3 shoots per culturee0
Qualifier
every three weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“FICUS CARICA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest multiplication rate, 5.3 shoots per culture, every three weeks, was achieved on a similar basal medium supplemented with 2.2 mu M BA and devoid of NAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium with 2.5 mu M IBA produced the best rooting response of 96.9 %.

Taxon
FICUS CARICA L.t0
Treatment
medium containing 2.5 mu M IBAe0
Outcome
rooting responsee0
Direction
beste0
Value
96.9 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“FICUS CARICA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best rooting response (96.9 %) was observed on the medium containing 2.5 mu M IBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micropropagated plantlets were acclimatized, grown in a greenhouse and established in a field orchard.

Taxon
FICUS CARICA L.t0
Outcome
successfully acclimatized and growne0
Qualifier
three monthse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Verbatim

t0

“FICUS CARICA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plantlets were successfully acclimatized and grown for three months in the greenhouse, and then field established for orchard production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–814 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micropropagated plants fruited two years after field establishment.

Taxon
FICUS CARICA L.t0
Outcome
produced fruitse0
Qualifier
two years after field-establishmente0

Verbatim

t0

“FICUS CARICA L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“Micropropagated plants produced fruits two years after field-establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–890 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

in vitro · growth · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

in vitro · pest · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.