Paper · 1996 · Indian Forester

Melampsora Larici-populina on Poplars in India and its Control in Nursery

Piyush Pandey; A. P. Singh; D. C. Karnatak; et al.

1
claims
3
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Melampsora larici-populina , an internationally known damaging foliar rust of poplars, has been dealt with in detail with regard to its current status in the country as an immigrant pathogen of concern, taxonomy, damage and control in the nursery. Foliar application of Bayleton (0.08%) has been found to be most effective in controlling the rust infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Bayleton at 0.08% was found most effective against rust infection in poplar nurseries.

Taxon
poplarsPopuluse1
Treatment
Foliar application of Bayleton (0.08%)e0
Interactor
Melampsora larici-populinae1pathogen
Outcome
rust infectione0
Direction
most effectivee0
Setting
Indiat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Poplars in India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of Bayleton (0.08%) has been found to be most effective in controlling the rust infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Melampsora larici-populina , an internationally known damaging foliar rust of poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.