Abstract
Investigation on the occurrences of poplar canker disease in the first and second year was conducted in this study. Poplars were treated by soaking in water,dipping enroot powder and applying ectomycorrhizal fungi. The results showed that soaking in water could lessen the occurrence of poplar canker disease. By contrast,dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year,but it could promote the survival rate of poplars. Applying ectomycorrhizal fungi could increase the breast diameter growth of seedling for the current year,and it could also reduce the occurrence of disease obviously in the next year. The Xerocomus chrysenteron had the best effect of promoting poplar's growth ,and the difference of breast diameter growth among X. chrysenteron with other treatments reached significant level.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Water soaking lessened first-year poplar canker occurrence.
PopulusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soaking in water could lessen the occurrence of poplar canker disease”
t0“poplar”
Claim · model-written summary
Enroot powder did not lessen canker occurrence in the first year.
- Treatment
- dipping enroot powdere0
- Outcome
- occurrence of the poplar canker diseasee0
- Direction
- could not lessene0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year”
t0“poplar”
Claim · model-written summary
Ectomycorrhizal fungi did not lessen canker occurrence in the first year.
- Treatment
- ectomycorrhizal fungie0
- Interactor
- ectomycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- occurrence of the poplar canker diseasee0
- Direction
- could not lessene0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year”
t0“poplar”
Claim · model-written summary
Enroot powder promoted poplar survival.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it could promote the survival rate of poplars”
e1“dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Ectomycorrhizal fungi promoted poplar survival.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it could promote the survival rate of poplars”
e1“dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Ectomycorrhizal fungi increased seedling breast diameter growth in the current year.
- Treatment
- Applying ectomycorrhizal fungie0
- Interactor
- ectomycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- breast diameter growth of seedlinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applying ectomycorrhizal fungi could increase the breast diameter growth of seedling for the current year”
t0“poplar”
Claim · model-written summary
Ectomycorrhizal fungi reduced disease occurrence in the next year.
- Treatment
- ectomycorrhizal fungie1
- Outcome
- occurrence of diseasee0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- in the next yeare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it could also reduce the occurrence of disease obviously in the next year”
t0“poplar”
e1“dipping enroot powder and ectomycorrhizal fungi could not lessen the occurrence of the poplar canker disease in the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Xerocomus chrysenteron most promoted poplar growth.
- Treatment
- Xerocomus chrysenterone0
- Interactor
- Xerocomus chrysenteron
Xerocomellus chrysenterone0symbiont - Outcome
- poplar's growthe0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The Xerocomus chrysenteron had the best effect of promoting poplar's growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Breast diameter growth under X. chrysenteron differed significantly from other treatments.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the difference of breast diameter growth among X. chrysenteron with other treatments reached significant level”
t0“poplar”
The same questions in other papers
Xerocomellus chrysenteron · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
mycorrhiza · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →mycorrhiza · survival · Populus (poplar)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
mycorrhiza · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.