Paper · 2010 · Xibei zhiwu xuebao

Physiological and Biochemical Mechanism of Mycorrhizal Fungi Improving the Resistance of Poplar to Canker Disease

Zhan Wei; Hongguang Liu; Ming Tang

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the changes of biochemical index and the proteins associated with disease resistance after inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(AMF) of Glomus mosseae and ectomycorrhizal fungi(ECMF) of Boletus luridus on the growth of healthy poplar 107(Populus×euramericana cv.'74/76') and the poplar attacked by canker disease.The possible mechanism of disease resistance induced by mycorrhizal fungi was primarily discussed.The results indicated that both AMF and ECMF significantly decreased the index and incidence of poplar canker disease and increased the content of chlorophyll,bark soluble protein content and root activity.In addition,both AMF and ECMF can decrease the content of malonaldehyde(MDA) and increase the free proline contents.The activity of superoxide dismutase(SOD) and phenylalnine ammonialyase(PAL) in diseased sites.AMF significantly induced the boost of activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in diseased sites,but ECMF just had a little effect.The index related with resisting canker disease among AMF was superior to ECMF,but both the incidence and disease index of canker disease of AMF were lower than ECMF,the effect of AMF was better when inoculating the poplar seedlings.It is clear that mycorrhizal fungi can improve the absorption of nutrient and growth of poplar when attacked by canker pathogen,the activity of protective enzyme and resistant compound were increased in the mycorrhizal poplar seedlings,producing large amount of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase to induce secondary defending reaction of poplar.Consequently,mycorrhizal fungi can remedy the harm of disease and improve the disease resistance of poplar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both AMF and ECMF significantly decreased the disease index and incidence of poplar canker disease.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
both AMF and ECMFe0
Interactor
canker diseasee0pathogen
Second interactor
AMF and ECMFe0symbiont
Outcome
index and incidence of poplar canker diseasee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both AMF and ECMF significantly decreased the index and incidence of poplar canker disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both AMF and ECMF increased chlorophyll content, bark soluble protein content and root activity in poplar.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
both AMF and ECMFe0
Interactor
AMF and ECMFe0symbiont
Outcome
content of chlorophyll,bark soluble protein content and root activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both AMF and ECMF significantly decreased the index and incidence of poplar canker disease and increased the content of chlorophyll,bark soluble protein content and root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both AMF and ECMF decreased the malonaldehyde (MDA) content in poplar.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
both AMF and ECMFe0
Interactor
AMF and ECMFe0symbiont
Outcome
content of malonaldehyde(MDA)e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both AMF and ECMF can decrease the content of malonaldehyde(MDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both AMF and ECMF increased the free proline content in poplar.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
both AMF and ECMFe0
Interactor
AMF and ECMFe0symbiont
Outcome
free proline contentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both AMF and ECMF can decrease the content of malonaldehyde(MDA) and increase the free proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF significantly boosted the activity of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase in diseased sites of poplar.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanasee0
Direction
booste0
Qualifier
in diseased sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF significantly induced the boost of activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in diseased sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ECMF had only a small effect on the activity of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase in diseased sites of poplar.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
ECMFe0
Interactor
ECMFe0symbiont
Outcome
activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanasee0
Direction
little effecte0
Qualifier
in diseased sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF significantly induced the boost of activity of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in diseased sites,but ECMF just had a little effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both the incidence and disease index of canker disease were lower with AMF than with ECMF in poplar.

Taxon
PoplarPopulust0
Treatment
AMFe0
Interactor
canker diseasee0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
incidence and disease index of canker diseasee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ECMFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the incidence and disease index of canker disease of AMF were lower than ECMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi improved nutrient absorption and growth of poplar attacked by canker pathogen.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
canker pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
absorption of nutrient and growth of poplare0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal fungi can improve the absorption of nutrient and growth of poplar when attacked by canker pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective enzyme activity and resistant compounds were increased in mycorrhizal poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
mycorrhizale0
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
activity of protective enzyme and resistant compounde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activity of protective enzyme and resistant compound were increased in the mycorrhizal poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1461 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors explain induced secondary defence in poplar by the large amounts of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase produced in mycorrhizal seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Gene
chitinase and β-1,3-glucanasee0
Outcome
secondary defending reactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“producing large amount of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase to induce secondary defending reaction of poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1566 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · physiology: enzyme activity · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: oxidative · Populus (poplar)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.