Paper · 2019 · Plant Soil and Environment

Exogenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase soil organic carbon and change microbial community in poplar rhizosphere

Haoqiang Zhang; Ting Liu; Yuanyuan Wang; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase soil organic carbon (SOC) deposition via secretion of glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) and modulation of plant carbon partition. Two exogenous AMF inocula (Rhizophagus irregularis and Glomus versiforme) were applied to the roots of Populus × canadensis seedlings grown in the unsterilized nursery soil. The diversity of fungal and bacterial communities was assessed by the polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) method, while the accumulation of GRSP and SOC content in 22.5 cm-deep soil was measured. The results indicated that two AMF additions increased root colonization frequency as well as poplar biomass, especially root biomass accumulation. Two AMF applications improved the easily extractable-GRSP, total-GRSP, and SOC accumulation in the rhizosphere of poplar seedlings, limited the fungal community, and exerted no influence on the bacterial community. The effect of G. versiforme on GRSP and SOC accumulation was higher than that of R. irregularis. The AMF introduced GRSP, and SOC accumulation was highly correlated the limited fungal species richness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two AMF additions increased poplar root colonization frequency.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
two AMF additionse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonization frequencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that two AMF additions increased root colonization frequency as well as poplar biomass, especially root biomass accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two AMF additions increased poplar biomass, especially root biomass.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
two AMF additionse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
poplar biomass, especially root biomass accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that two AMF additions increased root colonization frequency as well as poplar biomass, especially root biomass accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF applications improved easily extractable GRSP, total GRSP and SOC accumulation in the poplar rhizosphere.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Two AMF applicationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
easily extractable-GRSP, total-GRSP, and SOC accumulatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two AMF applications improved the easily extractable-GRSP, total-GRSP, and SOC accumulation in the rhizosphere of poplar seedlings, limited the fungal community, and exerted no influence on the bacterial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF applications limited the fungal community in the poplar rhizosphere.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Two AMF applicationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
fungal communitye0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two AMF applications improved the easily extractable-GRSP, total-GRSP, and SOC accumulation in the rhizosphere of poplar seedlings, limited the fungal community, and exerted no influence on the bacterial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF applications had no influence on the bacterial community in the poplar rhizosphere.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
Two AMF applicationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial communitye0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two AMF applications improved the easily extractable-GRSP, total-GRSP, and SOC accumulation in the rhizosphere of poplar seedlings, limited the fungal community, and exerted no influence on the bacterial community.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. versiforme had a greater effect on GRSP and SOC accumulation than R. irregularis.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
G. versiformee0
Interactor
G. versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Second interactor
R. irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
GRSP and SOC accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
R. irregularise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · Second interactorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of G. versiforme on GRSP and SOC accumulation was higher than that of R. irregularis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GRSP and SOC accumulation was highly correlated with limited fungal species richness.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
GRSP, and SOC accumulatione0
Qualifier
highly correlated the limited fungal species richnesse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AMF introduced GRSP, and SOC accumulation was highly correlated the limited fungal species richness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · disease · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.