Paper · 2014

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on the biomass and bioenergy production of Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva' in sterilized and unsterilized soil

Ting LiuChunyan; WangHui Chen; Fengru FangXiaoqin; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis can improve the growth of poplar, which is considered to be a bioenergy feedstock and a substitute for fossil fuels. Microbes in plant rhizosphere may affect the interaction between AM fungi and host plant. The role of AM fungi on the biomass and bioenergy production of poplar in the presence or absence of other soil microorganisms was less investigated. In this study, the effects of Rhizophagus irregularis and Glomus versiforme on the growth, root- absorbing area, chlorophyll content, gas exchange, total organic carbon (TOC) content, gross calorie value (GCV), lignin and cellulose content of Populus 9 canadensis 'Neva' in sterilized and unsterilized soil were evaluated. The results showed that AM symbiosis increased the bio- mass parameters such as stem length, ground diameter, dry weight, root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity, as well as bioenergy parameters such as TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings, but did not affect the cellulose content. The extent of this enhancement varied within AM fungi species and soil conditions. The effect of AM was higher in sterilized soil than that in unsterilized soil, and the function of R. irreg- ularis was greater than G. versiforme in sterilized soil, but lower in unsterilized soil. In general, G. versiforme exhibited higher applying potential in the biomass and bioenergy production of poplar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis increased stem length, ground diameter and dry weight of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise0
Outcome
stem length, ground diameter, dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM symbiosis increased the bio- mass parameters such as stem length, ground diameter, dry weight, root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity, as well as bioenergy parameters such as TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings, but did not affect the cellulose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis increased root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise0
Outcome
root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM symbiosis increased the bio- mass parameters such as stem length, ground diameter, dry weight, root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity, as well as bioenergy parameters such as TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings, but did not affect the cellulose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis increased TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise0
Outcome
TOC content, GCV and lignin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM symbiosis increased the bio- mass parameters such as stem length, ground diameter, dry weight, root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity, as well as bioenergy parameters such as TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings, but did not affect the cellulose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM symbiosis did not affect poplar cellulose content.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
AM symbiosise0
Outcome
cellulose contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM symbiosis increased the bio- mass parameters such as stem length, ground diameter, dry weight, root-absorbing area, chlorophyll content and gas exchange capacity, as well as bioenergy parameters such as TOC content, GCV and lignin content of poplar seedlings, but did not affect the cellulose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–1045 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM enhancement varied by fungal species and soil conditions.

Taxon
Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva't0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
extent of this enhancemente0
Setting
soil conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“The extent of this enhancement varied within AM fungi species and soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM effect was higher in sterilized than unsterilized soil.

Taxon
Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva't0
Treatment
AMe0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
effect of AMe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unsterilized soile0
Setting
sterilized soile0

Verbatim

t0

“Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of AM was higher in sterilized soil than that in unsterilized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. irreg- ularis function exceeded G. versiforme in sterilized soil.

Taxon
Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva't0
Interactor
R. irreg- ularise0symbiont
Outcome
function of R. irreg- ularise0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
G. versiformee0
Setting
sterilized soile0

Verbatim

t0

“Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“the function of R. irreg- ularis was greater than G. versiforme in sterilized soil, but lower in unsterilized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. irreg- ularis function was lower than G. versiforme in unsterilized soil.

Taxon
Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva't0
Interactor
R. irreg- ularise0symbiont
Outcome
function of R. irreg- ularise0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
G. versiformee0
Setting
unsterilized soile0

Verbatim

t0

“Populus 3 canadensis 'Neva'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–117 · show in text ↑
e0

“the function of R. irreg- ularis was greater than G. versiforme in sterilized soil, but lower in unsterilized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1327 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

G. versiforme had higher application potential for poplar biomass and bioenergy production.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Interactor
G. versiformeDiversispora versiformise0symbiont
Outcome
applying potential in the biomass and bioenergy productione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. versiforme exhibited higher applying potential in the biomass and bioenergy production of poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1440 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: gas exchange · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.