Paper · 2014 · Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology

Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and anatomical properties of stomata and xylem in poplars

L. C. Tin

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aims Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(AMF) were previously reported to afford some plant species with greater resistance to drought stress. Most of the mycorrhizal studies have been focused on physiological responses of host plants affected by AMF. However, characteristics of stomata, vessel and fibre are also closely related to plant water use efficiency. Hence, this study was conducted to examine the effects of AMF on anatomical properties of stomata and xylem in poplars. Methods A controlled pot-experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of an AMF, Rhizophagus irregularis, on the anatomical properties of stomata and xylem in Populus × canadensis(P. nigra × P. deltoides) ‘Neva' under drought and well watered conditions. Important findings Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings. The effects of AMF on biomass and vessel diameter were greater under drought condition than under well watered condition; whereas the effects on stomatal length were greater under well watered condition than under drought condition. AMF imposed a positive effect on stomatal density and a negative effect on fibre length, but did not affect water deficit in seedlings under well watered condition. Under drought, the effects of AMF were positive on fibre diameter, negative on water deficit, and not significant on stomatal density. In summary, the effects of AMF on vessel properties were greater under drought condition than under well watered condition; whereas the effects on stomatal properties were stronger under well watered condition than under drought condition. This might be beneficial for plants to maintain water and reduce water deficit when suffering from drought. Hence, AMF could promote the drought tolerance in poplars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased biomass production, stomatal length and vessel diameter of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diametere1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of an AMF, Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF increased fibre length of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
fibre lengthe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effects of an AMF, Rhizophagus irregularis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of AMF on biomass and vessel diameter was greater under drought than under well-watered conditions.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe2
Outcome
biomass and vessel diametere2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
under drought conditione2
Comparator
under well watered conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effects of AMF on biomass and vessel diameter were greater under drought condition than under well watered condition; whereas the effects on stomatal length were greater under well watered condition than under drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of AMF on stomatal length was greater under well-watered than under drought conditions.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe2
Outcome
stomatal lengthe2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
under well watered conditione2
Comparator
under drought conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effects of AMF on biomass and vessel diameter were greater under drought condition than under well watered condition; whereas the effects on stomatal length were greater under well watered condition than under drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under well-watered conditions, AMF had a positive effect on stomatal density of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe3
Outcome
stomatal densitye3
Direction
positive effecte3
Qualifier
under well watered conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e3

“AMF imposed a positive effect on stomatal density and a negative effect on fibre length, but did not affect water deficit in seedlings under well watered condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under well-watered conditions, AMF had a negative effect on fibre length of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe3
Outcome
fibre lengthe3
Direction
negative effecte3
Qualifier
under well watered conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e3

“AMF imposed a positive effect on stomatal density and a negative effect on fibre length, but did not affect water deficit in seedlings under well watered condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under well-watered conditions, AMF did not affect water deficit of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe3
Outcome
water deficite3
Direction
did not affecte3
Qualifier
under well watered conditione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e3

“AMF imposed a positive effect on stomatal density and a negative effect on fibre length, but did not affect water deficit in seedlings under well watered condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, AMF had a positive effect on fibre diameter of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe4
Outcome
fibre diametere4
Direction
positivee4
Qualifier
Under droughte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under drought, the effects of AMF were positive on fibre diameter, negative on water deficit, and not significant on stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, AMF had a negative effect on water deficit of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe4
Outcome
water deficite4
Direction
negativee4
Qualifier
Under droughte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under drought, the effects of AMF were positive on fibre diameter, negative on water deficit, and not significant on stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, AMF had no significant effect on stomatal density of poplar seedlings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Treatment
AMFe4
Outcome
stomatal densitye4
Direction
not significante4
Qualifier
Under droughte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that AMF increased the biomass production, stomatal length, vessel diameter and fibre length of the poplar seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–889 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under drought, the effects of AMF were positive on fibre diameter, negative on water deficit, and not significant on stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF could promote drought tolerance in poplars.

Taxon
poplarsPopuluse5
Treatment
AMFe5
Outcome
drought tolerancee5
Direction
promotee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Hence, AMF could promote the drought tolerance in poplars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1829 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · Rhizophagus irregularis · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: gas exchange · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · tolerance: abiotic · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Populus (poplar)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.