Paper · 2005

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield of pea (Pisum sativum)

R. L. Rajput; S.S. Kushwah

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 1995–96 to 1997–98 to find out the effect of bio-fertilizers on production of pea. On the basis of three years pooled data, the highest yield was recorded with the application of recommended doses of fertilizer followed by soil application of bio-fertllizers mixed 25 kg FYM along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizers and were at par statistically. So the use of bio-fertilizer with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer saved 50% N, P (10 kg N. 25 kg P2O5. It also saved the financial resources as well as FYM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer doses produced the highest pea yield, statistically comparable to biofertilizer plus 25 kg FYM and half fertilizer dose.

Treatment
recommended doses of fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
soil application of bio-fertllizers mixed 25 kg FYM along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield was recorded with the application of recommended doses of fertilizer followed by soil application of bio-fertllizers mixed 25 kg FYM along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizers and were at par statistically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer with half the recommended fertilizer dose saved 50% N and P inputs.

Treatment
bio-fertilizer with 50% recommended dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
N, Pe0
Direction
savede0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of bio-fertilizer with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer saved 50% N, P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biofertilizer regime saved financial resources and FYM.

Outcome
financial resources as well as FYMe0
Direction
savede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also saved the financial resources as well as FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea (Pisum sativum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–72 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.