Paper · 2012 · University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly)

EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

Spyridon Α. Petropoulos; E. M. Khah; H.C. Passam

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of grafting and post-grafting temperature on the plant development of two watermelon cultivars at transplantation and on subsequent fruit quality was studied. Watermelon cv. Sugar Baby and Crimson Sweet were self-rooted or grafted onto rootstock RS 841 F-1 (Cucurbita maxima x C. moschata) or bottle-gourd [Lagenaria siceraria f. clavata] (year 1), plus L. siceraria f. pyrotheca (year 2). After grafting, plants were held at 8 degrees C or 16 degrees C (minimum) until transplantation (28-29 days), at which stage growth was compared with that of the self-rooted control held under the same conditions. Plants were planted in the field and fruit quality assessed at harvest. At the time of transplantation in year 1, plants at 16 degrees C were taller and had a higher total fresh weight than those at 8 degrees C. The grafted plants of both cultivars were taller and had a higher leaf area and fresh weight than the self-rooted plants, irrespective of rootstock. In year 2, the grafted plants of both cultivars had better development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight) than self-rooted plants. The plants of Crimson Sweet x L. siceraria f. pyrotheca were taller than those of the other two scion-rootstock combinations, irrespective of temperature. Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants, and sugar content varied with scion-rootstock combination. Grafting of watermelon results in better plant growth by the time of transplantation, whereas the scion-rootstock combination affects fruit quality. A minimum temperature of 16 degrees C is indicated during the post-grafting stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted watermelon plants had higher leaf area and fresh weight than self-rooted plants in year 1.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Sugar Baby and Crimson Sweete0
Treatment
graftede2
Outcome
leaf area and fresh weighte2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
tallere2
Comparator
self-rooted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e0

“Watermelon cv. Sugar Baby and Crimson Sweet were self-rooted or grafted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–241 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grafted plants of both cultivars were taller and had a higher leaf area and fresh weight than the self-rooted plants, irrespective of rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants held at 16 degrees C after grafting had higher total fresh weight than those at 8 degrees C at transplantation in year 1.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
16 degrees Ce1
Outcome
total fresh weighte1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
were tallere1
Comparator
8 degrees Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the time of transplantation in year 1, plants at 16 degrees C were taller and had a higher total fresh weight than those at 8 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year 2, grafted watermelon plants had better development than self-rooted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede3
Outcome
development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight)e3
Direction
bettere3
Qualifier
In year 2e3
Comparator
self-rooted plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e3

“In year 2, the grafted plants of both cultivars had better development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight) than self-rooted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson Sweet x L. siceraria f. pyrotheca plants were taller than plants of the other two scion-rootstock combinations, irrespective of temperature.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Crimson Sweet x L. siceraria f. pyrothecae4
Outcome
plantse4
Direction
tallere4
Qualifier
irrespective of temperaturee4
Comparator
the other two scion-rootstock combinationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e4

“The plants of Crimson Sweet x L. siceraria f. pyrotheca were taller than those of the other two scion-rootstock combinations, irrespective of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
graftede5
Outcome
Mean fruit weight at harveste5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
self-rooted plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants, and sugar content varied with scion-rootstock combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar content varied with the scion-rootstock combination.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
scion-rootstock combinatione5
Outcome
sugar contente5
Qualifier
varied with scion-rootstock combinatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants, and sugar content varied with scion-rootstock combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1417 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The scion-rootstock combination affects watermelon fruit quality.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
scion-rootstock combinatione6
Outcome
fruit qualitye6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas the scion-rootstock combination affects fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1566 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A minimum temperature of 16 degrees C is recommended during the post-grafting stage.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
post-grafting stagee7
Outcome
minimum temperature of 16 degrees Ce7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF ROOTSTOCKS FOR WATERMELON GRAFTING WITH REFERENCE TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–109 · show in text ↑
e7

“A minimum temperature of 16 degrees C is indicated during the post-grafting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1649 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Grafting increased watermelon fruit size.

    Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting · 2007 · compared with non-grafted control

    Same directionCited by this paper

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.