Paper · 1970 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of foliar sprays for frost protection in test with young citrus trees

Russell M. Burns

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

A number OF new chemical sprays were tested for frost protection of young citrus during the winter of 1969-70. Fifteen commercial compounds were sprayed on container-grown grapefruit nursery trees and young lemon trees in the field. Most of the compounds were antitranspirants (film-forming, stomata closing, and reflecting types). Growth inhibitors used were maleic hydrazide (MH), potassium salt of 6-hydroxy-3-(2H)-pyridacinone (KMH), and ethyl hydrogen 1-prophylphosphonate (NIA-10637). Freezing the grapefruit nursery trees in a cold chamber resulted in no significant differences in the amount of cold protection given by any of the sprays. Temperatures in the field where the young lemon trial was located never reached freezing, but there were significant differences in growth response to the different sprays.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing container-grown grapefruit nursery trees in a cold chamber showed no significant differences in cold protection among the sprays.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
sprayse0
Outcome
amount of cold protectione0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Setting
cold chambere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Freezing the grapefruit nursery trees in a cold chamber resulted in no significant differences in the amount of cold protection given by any of the sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the young lemon field trial there were significant differences in growth response to the different sprays.

Treatment
different sprayse0
Outcome
growth responsee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperatures in the field where the young lemon trial was located never reached freezing, but there were significant differences in growth response to the different sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–818 · show in text ↑

application · control · Citrus x paradisi (grapefruit)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.