Paper · 2009 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of tillage practices and mulching options on productivity, economics and soil physical properties of maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system.

Peeyush Sharma; Vikas Abrol; G. R. Maruthi Sankar; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A Field experiment was conducted during 2005-06 and 2006-07 at Dryland Research Sub Station, Dhiansar to study the influence of tillage and mulching practices on crop productivity, economics and soil properties of maize -wheat system under rainfed situation.Four different tillage methods, viz conventional, minimum, no tillage and raised bed were used in the main plots and four different mulch materials, viz straw, polyethylene, soil mulch including no mulch were used in the sub-plots. Tillage practices significantly influenced the yield of maize and wheat. Grain yield of maize and wheat was statistically at par in conventional and minimum tillage system and significantly higher than no tillage system in both the years. Mulching also resulted in increased in yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield of maize (1.91tonnes/ha) and wheat (0.63 tonnes/ha) was recorded from polyethylene mulch, followed by straw mulch (1.77 tonnes/ha, 0.61tonnes/ha) respectively. Minimum tillage and polyethylene mulch or straw mulch conserve more moisture and infiltration rate than other tillage methods and mulch application. The highest mean net returns (Rs 10 078) and benefit:cost ratio (1.28) was obtained with minimum tillage and lowest with conventional tillage (Rs 8 631 0.90). Minimum tillage in conjunction with polyethylene mulch or straw mulch was economically profitable and improve, the crop production and soil quality for maize-wheat sequence in rainfed condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and minimum tillage gave statistically similar grain yield in both crops.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
Grain yield of maize and wheate0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
conventional and minimum tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of maize and wheat was statistically at par in conventional and minimum tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and minimum tillage yielded more grain than no tillage.

Taxon
maize and wheatTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional and minimum tillage systeme0
Outcome
Grain yield of maize and wheate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
no tillage systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of maize and wheat was statistically at par in conventional and minimum tillage system and significantly higher than no tillage system in both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased yield.

Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching also resulted in increased in yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene mulch gave maize grain yield of 1.91 tonnes per hectare.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
grain yield of maizee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.91tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
1.77 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
straw mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher mean grain yield of maize (1.91tonnes/ha) and wheat (0.63 tonnes/ha) was recorded from polyethylene mulch, followed by straw mulch (1.77 tonnes/ha, 0.61tonnes/ha) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyethylene mulch gave wheat grain yield of 0.63 tonnes per hectare.

Treatment
polyethylene mulche0
Outcome
wheate0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.63 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
0.61tonnes/hae0
Comparator
straw mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher mean grain yield of maize (1.91tonnes/ha) and wheat (0.63 tonnes/ha) was recorded from polyethylene mulch, followed by straw mulch (1.77 tonnes/ha, 0.61tonnes/ha) respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage with polyethylene or straw mulch conserved more moisture and infiltration than alternatives.

Treatment
Minimum tillage and polyethylene mulch or straw mulche0
Outcome
moisture and infiltration ratee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other tillage methods and mulch applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage and polyethylene mulch or straw mulch conserve more moisture and infiltration rate than other tillage methods and mulch application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had highest mean net returns of Rs 10 078.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
mean net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs 10 078e0
Qualifier
Rs 8 631e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean net returns (Rs 10 078) and benefit:cost ratio (1.28) was obtained with minimum tillage and lowest with conventional tillage (Rs 8 631 0.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage had highest benefit:cost ratio of 1.28.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.28e0
Qualifier
0.90e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean net returns (Rs 10 078) and benefit:cost ratio (1.28) was obtained with minimum tillage and lowest with conventional tillage (Rs 8 631 0.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.