Paper · 2007

Recent advances to improve nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane in the South African sugar industry.

J. H. Meyer; Arnold W. Schumann; R. A. Wood; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
30
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

THE NITROGEN requirement of sugarcane in South Africa has been the subject of extensive research. Results of more than 200 trials conducted over the past four decades have shown that the response to applied N can be highly variable and that N use efficiency by the crop can be influenced by ecological factors such as season, rainfall, nature of the soil as well as cultural practices that include variety, irrigation, N form, rate, timing and method of N placement. Local research results are reviewed and specific outcomes that have modified N use efficiency include: Soil specific nitrogen fertiliser recommendations for the main agro-climatic zones that are based on soil organic matter status and the potential of the soil to release N; For advisory purposes, an analytical method based on Near Infra-red Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) was pioneered to rapidly measure the organic matter and nitrogen mineralisation potential of soil; A new laboratory test to predict potential ammonia volatilisation losses from surface-applied urea fertiliser; Improved N fertiliser use efficiency through fertigation; Classification of sugarcane varieties into one of three categories of N use efficiency and the impact on N recommendations; The use of the leaf and stalk N/Si ratio as a predictor of risk from stalk borer damage; Development of robust leaf N thresholds using a continuous model Fourier function and the use of DRIS to more accurately diagnose the nitrogen status of sugarcane. In general, the adoption by growers of a number of these research outcomes over the past two decades has resulted in an improvement of fertiliser N use efficiency from 2.0 kg N/t of harvested cane in 1980 to the current level of about 1.45 kg N/t cane, without compromising average cane yields. This represents an overall improvement in irrigated areas of about 28% in N fertiliser use efficiency. Introduction In South Africa as in most other sugarcane growing countries, efficient fertiliser practices have contributed greatly to sugarcane productivity. This has largely been achieved through better management practices and advances in the development of soil and leaf testing methods for predicting the macro and micro nutrient fertiliser requirement of sugarcane. Nitrogen (N) is still undoubtedly the most influential plant nutrient in global sugarcane production, as too little can impact negatively on sucrose production and too much can cause lodging, reduced cane quality and increased risk of pest and disease infestation. Predicting the correct amount of nitrogen to apply to sugarcane remains the most difficult and elusive of all

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedreview summarymeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane response to applied nitrogen was highly variable across trials.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
response to applied Ne0
Qualifier
highly variablee0

Verbatim

e0

“the response to applied N can be highly variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarymeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane nitrogen use efficiency was influenced by season, rainfall, soil, variety, irrigation and nitrogen application practices.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Qualifier
season, rainfall, nature of the soil as well as cultural practices that include variety, irrigation, N form, rate, timing and method of N placemente0
Setting
South Africae1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“N use efficiency by the crop can be influenced by ecological factors such as season, rainfall, nature of the soil as well as cultural practices that include variety, irrigation, N form, rate, timing and method of N placement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–465 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A soil specific nitrogen fertilizer recommendation system was developed for sugarcane agroclimatic zones.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
Soil specific nitrogen fertiliser recommendationse0
Qualifier
based on soil organic matter status and the potential of the soil to release Ne0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Soil specific nitrogen fertiliser recommendations for the main agro-climatic zones that are based on soil organic matter status and the potential of the soil to release N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NIRS was pioneered as a rapid advisory measure of soil organic matter and nitrogen mineralization potential for sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
organic matter and nitrogen mineralisation potential of soile0
Qualifier
rapidly measuree0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“an analytical method based on Near Infra-red Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) was pioneered to rapidly measure the organic matter and nitrogen mineralisation potential of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A laboratory test was developed to predict ammonia volatilization losses from surface-applied urea fertilizer in sugarcane management.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
surface-applied urea fertilisere0
Outcome
potential ammonia volatilisation lossese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“A new laboratory test to predict potential ammonia volatilisation losses from surface-applied urea fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation improved sugarcane nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
fertigatione0
Outcome
N fertiliser use efficiencye0
Direction
Improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Improved N fertiliser use efficiency through fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane varieties were classified into three nitrogen use efficiency categories affecting nitrogen recommendations.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
sugarcane varietiese0
Outcome
categories of N use efficiencye0
Value
three categoriese0

Verbatim

e0

“Classification of sugarcane varieties into one of three categories of N use efficiency and the impact on N recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1232 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stalk nitrogen to silicon ratio was used to predict stalk borer damage risk in sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Interactor
stalk borere0pest
Outcome
risk from stalk borer damagee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the leaf and stalk N/Si ratio as a predictor of risk from stalk borer damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A Fourier function supplied leaf nitrogen thresholds for sugarcane diagnosis.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
leaf N thresholdse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Development of robust leaf N thresholds using a continuous model Fourier function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

DRIS was used for more accurate diagnosis of sugarcane nitrogen status.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
nitrogen status of sugarcanee0
Direction
more accuratelye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“the use of DRIS to more accurately diagnose the nitrogen status of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grower adoption of research outcomes improved sugarcane fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency from 2.0 to about 1.45 kg N per tonne cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
fertiliser N use efficiencye0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
about 1.45 kg N/t canee0
Qualifier
2.0 kg N/t of harvested cane in 1980e0

Verbatim

e0

“improvement of fertiliser N use efficiency from 2.0 kg N/t of harvested cane in 1980 to the current level of about 1.45 kg N/t cane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1738 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average sugarcane yields were not compromised during improved nitrogen efficiency.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
average cane yieldse0
Direction
without compromisinge0

Verbatim

e0

“without compromising average cane yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1780 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated areas achieved about 28% improvement in sugarcane nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Outcome
N fertiliser use efficiencye0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
about 28%e0
Setting
irrigated arease0

Verbatim

e0

“an overall improvement in irrigated areas of about 28% in N fertiliser use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1883 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane in South Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–53 · show in text ↑