Paper · 2010 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Effect of bio-fertilizers and NPK levels on growth and yield of mid-maturity group of cauliflower under mid hill subhumid conditions of Himachal Pradesh

K.C. Sharma; Lalit Kumar Sharma

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2008 and 2009 to investigate the effect of different levels of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter and PSB) in combination with fourlevels of NPK fertilizers on growth and yield of cauliflower hybrid ‘Swati’. The application of bio-fertilizers alone and in combination resulted in significant improvement in plant height, number of leaves/plant, curd diameter, curd depth, gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio. The increased marketable curd yield was to the tune of 26.4%, 24.19% and 18.16% with the combination of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control. The application of NPK fertilizers significantly increased all the growth and yield parameters along with marketable curd yield over control with each incremental level of NPK. The interaction effects showed that gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio were increased in a linear manner with the application of bio-inoculants integrated with increasing levels of NPK fertilizers. The highest marketable yield (247 q/ha) was recorded when the plots were supplemented with 100% NPK + seedlings dipping of both the inoculants. Furthermore, it was observed that the yield (238.66 q/ha) obtained with the application of 75% NPK +Azotobacter +PSB was at par with that of recommended NPK (100%), thus resulting in net saving of 25% NPK fertilizers with maximum benefit cost ratio(5.06).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers improved cauliflower growth, curd traits, yield and benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
bio-fertilizers alone and in combinatione0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves/plant, curd diametere0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of bio-fertilizers alone and in combination resulted in significant improvement in plant height, number of leaves/plant, curd diameter, curd depth, gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers improved curd depth, gross weight, and marketable yield.

Treatment
bio-fertilizers alone and in combinatione0
Outcome
curd depth, gross weight/plant, marketable curd yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of bio-fertilizers alone and in combination resulted in significant improvement in plant height, number of leaves/plant, curd diameter, curd depth, gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers improved benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
bio-fertilizers alone and in combinatione0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of bio-fertilizers alone and in combination resulted in significant improvement in plant height, number of leaves/plant, curd diameter, curd depth, gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable curd yield increased under bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB).

Treatment
bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter + PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
marketable curd yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.4%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased marketable curd yield was to the tune of 26.4%, 24.19% and 18.16% with the combination of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable curd yield increased under PSB.

Treatment
PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
marketable curd yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.19%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased marketable curd yield was to the tune of 26.4%, 24.19% and 18.16% with the combination of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable curd yield increased under Azotobacter.

Treatment
Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
marketable curd yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.16%e0
Comparator
un-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased marketable curd yield was to the tune of 26.4%, 24.19% and 18.16% with the combination of bio-fertilizers (Azotobacter + PSB), PSB and Azotobacter, respectively over un-inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK levels significantly increased growth and yield parameters.

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of NPK fertilizers significantly increased all the growth and yield parameters along with marketable curd yield over control with each incremental level of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK levels significantly increased marketable curd yield.

Treatment
NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
marketable curd yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of NPK fertilizers significantly increased all the growth and yield parameters along with marketable curd yield over control with each incremental level of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated inoculants and increasing NPK raised gross weight, yield and benefit cost ratio linearly.

Treatment
bio-inoculants integrated with increasing levels of NPK fertilizerse0
Outcome
gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross weight/plant, marketable curd yield and benefit cost ratio were increased in a linear manner with the application of bio-inoculants integrated with increasing levels of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full NPK plus both inoculants gave the highest marketable yield of 247 q/ha.

Treatment
100% NPK + seedlings dipping of both the inoculantse0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
247 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest marketable yield (247 q/ha) was recorded when the plots were supplemented with 100% NPK + seedlings dipping of both the inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

75% NPK plus both inoculants yielded 238.66 q/ha, on par with full NPK.

Treatment
75% NPK +Azotobacter +PSBe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Value
238.66 q/hae0
Comparator
recommended NPK (100%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield (238.66 q/ha) obtained with the application of 75% NPK +Azotobacter +PSB was at par with that of recommended NPK (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% NPK inoculant regime saved 25% NPK fertilizer.

Outcome
net saving of 25% NPK fertilizerse0
Direction
savinge0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thus resulting in net saving of 25% NPK fertilizers with maximum benefit cost ratio(5.06)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 50 positive, 5 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 62 positive, 4 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.