Abstract
Conducted to study the effect of resource conservation practices and conventional practice on population of Meloidogyne graminicola affecting different plant growth parameters in rice revealed that higher populations of second stage juvenile was obtained from fields with intervention of zero tillage. However, conventional practice and zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbania had considerably low populations. Maximum stunting was found in case of zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with residue whereas soil of conventional tilled transplanted puddle rice-conventional tilled broadcasted wheat with and without residues showed minimum reduction in plant height. Decline of shoot weight was found associated with advancement of stunting in most of the cases. Advancement in stunting was also found associated with root knot index which was 5.0 in case of different resource conservation practices as compare to zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbania and conventional practice which was less than 3.0. It was found that initial population of nematode, stunting, and shoot weight reduction is much higher in resource conservation practices as compare to conventional practice whereas sesbania incorporation in resource conservation practices was found as a better option for the management of M.graminicola.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage fields had higher second-stage juvenile populations.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“higher populations of second stage juvenile was obtained from fields with intervention of zero tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional practice and zero tillage with sesbania had low juvenile populations.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbaniae0
- Outcome
- populationse0
- Direction
- lowe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“conventional practice and zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbania had considerably low populations.”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage rice and wheat with residue produced maximum stunting.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with residuee0
- Outcome
- stuntinge0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum stunting was found in case of zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with residue”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage treatments had minimum plant height reduction.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- conventional tilled transplanted puddle rice-conventional tilled broadcasted wheat with and without residuese0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- minimum reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil of conventional tilled transplanted puddle rice-conventional tilled broadcasted wheat with and without residues showed minimum reduction in plant height.”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot-weight decline was associated with increasing stunting.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Decline of shoot weight was found associated with advancement of stunting in most of the cases.”
Claim · model-written summary
Stunting increased with root knot index, which reached 5.0 under conservation practices versus less than 3.0 for sesbania and conventional practices.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- different resource conservation practicese0
- Outcome
- root knot indexe0
- Value
- 5.0e0
- Qualifier
- less than 3.0e0
- Comparator
- zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbania and conventional practicee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Advancement in stunting was also found associated with root knot index which was 5.0 in case of different resource conservation practices as compare to zero tillage rice-zero tillage wheat with sesbania and conventional practice which was less than 3.0.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation practices had higher initial nematode populations than conventional practice.
- Treatment
- resource conservation practicese0
- Outcome
- initial population of nematodee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- conventional practicee0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“initial population of nematode, stunting, and shoot weight reduction is much higher in resource conservation practices as compare to conventional practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation practices caused higher stunting and shoot-weight reduction than conventional practice.
- Treatment
- resource conservation practicese0
- Outcome
- stunting, and shoot weight reductione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- conventional practicee0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“initial population of nematode, stunting, and shoot weight reduction is much higher in resource conservation practices as compare to conventional practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesbania incorporation was judged a better option for managing M. graminicola.
- Interactor
- M.graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae0pathogen
- Outcome
- sesbania incorporation in resource conservation practicese0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“sesbania incorporation in resource conservation practices was found as a better option for the management of M.graminicola.”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →tillage · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
145 papers more in this group
See all 149 papers →transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.