Abstract
A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation. Tillage treatments consisting of ridge-till, fall-till, spring-till, and no-till were also evaluated to determine if yields could be maintained by alleviating compaction from grazing in the spring. Grazing treatments overall, and specifically in the ridge-till and no-till systems, resulted in increased yields. Residue cover was also more sensitive to changes in tillage rather than grazing; however, both treatments decreased residue cover.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Spring grazing of corn residue increased subsequent soybean yields overall.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- grazing corn residue during the springe0
- Outcome
- soybean yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation”
e1“Grazing treatments overall, and specifically in the ridge-till and no-till systems, resulted in increased yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring grazing of corn residue increased soybean yields in ridge-till and no-till systems.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- grazing corn residue during the springe0
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- ridge-till and no-till systemse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation”
e1“Grazing treatments overall, and specifically in the ridge-till and no-till systems, resulted in increased yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Residue cover was more sensitive to changes in tillage than to grazing.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- changes in tillagee2
- Outcome
- Residue covere2
- Direction
- more sensitivee2
- Comparator
- grazinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation”
e2“Residue cover was also more sensitive to changes in tillage rather than grazing; however, both treatments decreased residue cover”
Claim · model-written summary
Grazing decreased residue cover.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- grazinge2
- Outcome
- residue covere2
- Direction
- decreasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation”
e2“Residue cover was also more sensitive to changes in tillage rather than grazing; however, both treatments decreased residue cover”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage treatments decreased residue cover.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- Tillage treatmentse3
- Outcome
- residue covere2
- Direction
- decreasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A two-year experiment was designed to determine the impact of grazing corn residue during the spring on subsequent soybean yields in a corn-soybean rotation”
e2“Residue cover was also more sensitive to changes in tillage rather than grazing; however, both treatments decreased residue cover”
e3“Tillage treatments consisting of ridge-till, fall-till, spring-till, and no-till were also evaluated”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →grazing · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.