Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Disease Sciences

Efficacy of Botanicals, Bioagents and Fungicides on Management of Leaf Blight (Altbrnaria Porri) of Onion.

M. V. Bhosale; Ramchandra Perne; M. H. Shete; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The botanicals, biocontrol agent and fungicide were tried under field condition against leaf blight of onion. The mancozeb (0.3%) was found most effective in controlling the disease, which recorded 51 per cent disease control, followed by Trichoderma viride (38.84%). The sprays of mancozeb and Trichoderma viride also gave significantly highest onion bulb yield of 10.57 t/ha and 10.31 t/ha, respectively than rest of the treatments. The botanicals viz., L. camera and P. pinnata were also found effective and gave 27.08 per cent and 22.44 per cent disease control, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb at 0.3% gave 51 per cent disease control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
mancozeb (0.3%)e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
51 per cente0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The mancozeb (0.3%) was found most effective in controlling the disease, which recorded 51 per cent disease control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride gave 38.84% disease control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Trichoderma viride (38.84%)e0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
38.84%e0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by Trichoderma viride (38.84%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–266 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb spray gave 10.57 t/ha bulb yield, significantly above other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
mancozebe0
Outcome
onion bulb yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.57 t/hae0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sprays of mancozeb and Trichoderma viride also gave significantly highest onion bulb yield of 10.57 t/ha and 10.31 t/ha, respectively than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride spray gave 10.31 t/ha bulb yield, significantly above other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
onion bulb yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.31 t/hae0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The sprays of mancozeb and Trichoderma viride also gave significantly highest onion bulb yield of 10.57 t/ha and 10.31 t/ha, respectively than rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. camera gave 27.08 per cent disease control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
L. camerae0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
27.08 per cente0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The botanicals viz., L. camera and P. pinnata were also found effective and gave 27.08 per cent and 22.44 per cent disease control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. pinnata gave 22.44 per cent disease control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
P. pinnatae0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
22.44 per cente0
Setting
field conditione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The botanicals viz., L. camera and P. pinnata were also found effective and gave 27.08 per cent and 22.44 per cent disease control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–579 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–79 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mancozeb · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

mancozeb · control · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · organism · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.