mancozeb · Yield · Allium cepa (onion)

Results differ10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ

11 claims from these papers.

Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1

1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19851990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 9

  1. Chemical Control of Basal Rot of Onion in Zambia · 1981

  2. Control of onion downy mildew in the presence of phenylamide-resistant strains of Peronospora destructor (Berk.) Caspary · 1992

  3. EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROLLING DOWNY MILDEW AND PURPLE BLOTCH DISEASES OF ONION · 1995

  4. Efficacy of Botanicals, Bioagents and Fungicides on Management of Leaf Blight (Altbrnaria Porri) of Onion. · 2008

  5. Management of purple blotch and Stemphylium blight of onion in Tarai and Bhabar regions of Uttarakhand, India · 2016

  6. Polymer coating for higher pesticide use efficiency, seed yield and quality in onion (Allium cepa) · 2019

  7. Management of bulb rot of onion caused by Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora · 2020

  8. Management of Onion Rust through Host Resistance and Alternate Application of Fungicides in Adjara,Georgia · 2022

  9. Influence of Plant Density and Fungicides on Downy Mildew (Peronospora Destructor) and Bulb Yield of Onion in Ethiopia · 2024

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Reduction of Onion Yields by Chlorothalonil1 · 1982

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

mancozeb on Allium cepa (onion) against other targets

mancozeb · yield on other organisms