Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After six weeks storage, controls lost 94% of bulbs versus 45% with benomyl plus mancozeb.

A claim from Chemical Control of Basal Rot of Onion in Zambia · 1981

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six weeks storage, controls lost 94% of bulbs versus 45% with benomyl plus mancozeb.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
benomyl + mancozeb treatmente0
Outcome
lossese0
Value
45%e0
Qualifier
94%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“losses were 94% in controls and 45% in the benomyl + mancozeb treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–958
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 33–38

Title

Chemical Control of Basal Rot of Onion in Zambia

D. M. Naik; O. J. Burden Tropical Pest Management 1981. doi:10.1080/09670878109413826

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-eedc5e3f8dc061553febc934a459d1f16ee8b33f0efba55f556ae10882dfb1fa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

mancozeb · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.