Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Management of bulb rot of onion caused by Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora

P. M. Gore; RW Ingle; P. N. Rakhonde

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The bulb rot caused by Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora is major important disease of onion is difficult to control without application of bactericides and fungicides respectively. Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora causes 40 to 80% losses in onion. In present investigation studies were undertaken to manage bulb rot disease of onion through the use of bactericide and fungicides. Efficacy of different chemicals was tested by filter paper disc diffusion method against Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora. Maximum growth inhibition of Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora recorded in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin @ 200 ppm (23.00 mm), followed by streptomycin @ 200 ppm (18.00 mm). Under field condition, treatment with bulb dip in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin sulphate @ 200 ppm + spraying with copper oxychloride @ 0.25% was found most effective treatment against bulb rot of onion as it recorded minimum disease incidence (19.67%) with maximum disease control (53.46%). Maximum seed yield obtained in treatment with bulb dip copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin 200ppm + spraying with mancozeb @ 0.25% + carbendazim @ 0.10% + copper oxychloride @ 0.25% i.e 1022 kg/ha which was found significantly superior over rest of the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterium was reported to cause 40 to 80% onion losses.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovoraPectobacterium carotovorume0pathogen
Outcome
losses in onione0
Value
40 to 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora causes 40 to 80% losses in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–248 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride and streptomycin gave maximum in vitro inhibition of 23.00 mm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin @ 200 ppme0
Interactor
Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovoraPectobacterium carotovorume0pathogen
Outcome
growth inhibition of Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovorae0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
23.00 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectobacterium carotovorum
Pectobacterium carotovorum · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum growth inhibition of Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora recorded in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin @ 200 ppm (23.00 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomycin alone gave 18.00 mm inhibition.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
streptomycin @ 200 ppme0
Outcome
followed bye0
Value
18.00 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by streptomycin @ 200 ppm (18.00 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field bulb dip and copper spray gave minimum disease incidence of 19.67%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
bulb dip in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin sulphate @ 200 ppm + spraying with copper oxychloride @ 0.25%e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
19.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with bulb dip in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin sulphate @ 200 ppm + spraying with copper oxychloride @ 0.25% was found most effective treatment against bulb rot of onion as it recorded minimum disease incidence (19.67%) with maximum disease control (53.46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave maximum disease control of 53.46%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
bulb dip in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin sulphate @ 200 ppm + spraying with copper oxychloride @ 0.25%e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
maximume0
Value
53.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with bulb dip in copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin sulphate @ 200 ppm + spraying with copper oxychloride @ 0.25% was found most effective treatment against bulb rot of onion as it recorded minimum disease incidence (19.67%) with maximum disease control (53.46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bulb dip and sprays produced maximum seed yield of 1022 kg/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
bulb dip copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin 200ppm + spraying with mancozeb @ 0.25% + carbendazim @ 0.10% + copper oxychloride @ 0.25%e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1022 kg/hae0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum seed yield obtained in treatment with bulb dip copper oxychloride @ 0.25% + streptomycin 200ppm + spraying with mancozeb @ 0.25% + carbendazim @ 0.10% + copper oxychloride @ 0.25% i.e 1022 kg/ha which was found significantly superior over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

copper atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sulfate · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

streptomycin · control · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbendazim · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
    Foliar boron increased visible toxicity symptoms in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
    Foliar boron decreased yields in onions.

    The Contribution of Foliar Exposure to Boron Toxicity · 2007 · compared with without a component of foliar contact

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

application · control · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.