Abstract
The present investigation was carried out on thirteen year old ber trees cv. Banarasi Karaka of uniform vigour. The length and diameter of shoots of severely pruned trees was maximum. The fruit set and retention also decreased as the severity of pruning increased, weight and size of fruits improved significantly as the intensity of pruning levels increased. The fruit yield was more in the light pruning trees. The quality of fruits improved due to pruning effect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Severe pruning produced maximum shoot length and diameter.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Material
- Banarasi Karakae1
- Treatment
- severely prunede0
- Outcome
- length and diameter of shootse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The length and diameter of shoots of severely pruned trees was maximum.”
e1“ber trees cv. Banarasi Karaka”
t0“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set and retention decreased with more severe pruning.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- severity of pruninge0
- Outcome
- fruit set and retentione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit set and retention also decreased as the severity of pruning increased”
t0“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight and size improved significantly as pruning intensity increased.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- intensity of pruning levelse0
- Outcome
- weight and size of fruitse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weight and size of fruits improved significantly as the intensity of pruning levels increased.”
t0“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield was higher under light pruning.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- light pruninge0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit yield was more in the light pruning trees.”
t0“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning improved fruit quality.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianat0
- Treatment
- pruninge0
- Outcome
- quality of fruitse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The quality of fruits improved due to pruning effect.”
t0“ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.).”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · growth · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →light · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
pruning · yield · Ziziphus mauritiana (ber)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.