Paper · 1981 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Physiological Characteristics of Cowpea Rhizobia: Evaluation of Symbiotic Efficiency in Vigna unguiculata

R. M. Zablotowicz; D. D. Focht

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas) were evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes. Plants inoculated with slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 developed a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 24.6, 27.0, and 32 mumol of ethylene formed per plant per h, respectively, versus 6.4 mumol per plant per h in plants inoculated with the fast-growing strain 176A28. When inoculated with approximately equal proportions of rhizobia, the fast-growing strain 176A28 produced 95% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A22, but formed only 6% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A30. Consequently, there was no relation between the growth rate in vitro and the capability of rhizobia to compete for nodule-forming sites. Plants inoculated with strain 176A28 and subjected to drought during the vegetative growth period recovered to the same level of nitrogen fixation and nodulation as those that received adequate irrigation. On the other hand, plants inoculated with strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 failed to achieve the same levels of nodulation and nitrogen fixation under drought as compared with irrigated conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 176A22 gave a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 24.6, higher than the fast-growing strain 176A28 (6.4).

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A22e1
Treatment
slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
maximum acetylene reduction activitye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
24.6e1
Comparator
fast-growing strain 176A28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants inoculated with slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 developed a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 24.6, 27.0, and 32 mumol of ethylene formed per plant per h, respectively, versus 6.4 mumol per plant per h in plants inoculated with the fast-growing strain 176A28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–482 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 176A30 gave a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 27.0, higher than the fast-growing strain 176A28 (6.4).

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A30e1
Treatment
slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
maximum acetylene reduction activitye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
27.0e1
Comparator
fast-growing strain 176A28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants inoculated with slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 developed a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 24.6, 27.0, and 32 mumol of ethylene formed per plant per h, respectively, versus 6.4 mumol per plant per h in plants inoculated with the fast-growing strain 176A28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–482 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 176A32 gave a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 32, higher than the fast-growing strain 176A28 (6.4).

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A32e1
Treatment
slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
maximum acetylene reduction activitye1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
32e1
Comparator
fast-growing strain 176A28e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants inoculated with slow-growing strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 developed a maximum acetylene reduction activity of 24.6, 27.0, and 32 mumol of ethylene formed per plant per h, respectively, versus 6.4 mumol per plant per h in plants inoculated with the fast-growing strain 176A28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–482 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fast-growing strain 176A28 formed 95% of the nodules when challenged with slow-growing strain 176A22.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A28e4
Treatment
challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A22e4
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
nodulese4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
95%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“When inoculated with approximately equal proportions of rhizobia, the fast-growing strain 176A28 produced 95% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A22, but formed only 6% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–747 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fast-growing strain 176A28 formed only 6% of the nodules when challenged with slow-growing strain 176A30.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A28e4
Treatment
challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A30e4
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
nodulese4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
6%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“When inoculated with approximately equal proportions of rhizobia, the fast-growing strain 176A28 produced 95% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A22, but formed only 6% of the nodules when challenged with the slow-growing strain 176A30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–747 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No relation was found between in vitro growth rate of rhizobia and their capability to compete for nodule-forming sites.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
capability of rhizobia to compete for nodule-forming sitese5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“there was no relation between the growth rate in vitro and the capability of rhizobia to compete for nodule-forming sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–884 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 176A28 under drought during vegetative growth recovered to the same nitrogen fixation and nodulation as irrigated plants.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
176A28e6
Treatment
subjected to drought during the vegetative growth periode6
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen fixation and nodulatione6
Direction
recovered to the same levele6
Comparator
adequate irrigatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Plants inoculated with strain 176A28 and subjected to drought during the vegetative growth period recovered to the same level of nitrogen fixation and nodulation as those that received adequate irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1090 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strains 176A22, 176A30 and 176A32 under drought failed to reach the nodulation and nitrogen fixation levels of irrigated plants.

Taxon
Vigna unguiculataVigna unguiculatae2
Material
strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32e7
Treatment
under droughte7
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume3symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and nitrogen fixatione7
Direction
failed to achieve the same levelse7
Comparator
irrigated conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“plants inoculated with strains 176A22, 176A30, and 176A32 failed to achieve the same levels of nodulation and nitrogen fixation under drought as compared with irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1290 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluated for symbiotic performance on Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. cultivar California no. 5 blackeyes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–193 · show in text ↑
e3

“One fast-growing and three slow-growing strains of Rhizobium (isolated from cowpeas)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑

drought · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.