Paper · 1981 · Agronomy Journal

Nodulation and N Fixation of Field‐Grown California Cowpeas as Influenced by Well‐Irrigated and Droughted Conditions1

Robert M. Zablotowicz; Dennis D. Focht; Glen H. Cannell

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume. The N fixation process, however, is sensitive to water stress. This study was conducted to describe the development of nodulation and N fixation of field‐grown Californian cowpeas as influenced by stage of growth and drought. California No. 5 blackeyes were evaluated for nodulation and N fixation (as measured by acetylene reduction assay) utilizing four strains of Rhizobium sp. applied as seed inoculum. Two water regimes were utilized in this study: 1) the well‐watered regime was irrigated when the soil matric potential reached ‐0.6 bars at a depth of 20 cm, 2) the droughted regime received sufficient irrigation to allow good seed emergence, followed by a 42‐day period free of rain or irrigation. Maximum nodulation of 175 mg/plant was observed at flowering in the well‐watered plots versus 15 mg/plant in the droughted plants. Following this development stage, there was no significant difference in nodulation between water regimes. Maximum total nitrogenase activity was 22.5 and 18.8 µmoles of ethylene/plant/hour, respectively at flowering and pod‐fill in the well‐watered plants. The dry regime by contrast achieved a maximum nitrogenase activity of 5.3 and 4.5 µmoles ethylene/plant/hour at pod‐fill and pod yellowing stages of maturity, respectively. Consequently, there was a significant reduction in total nitrogenase activity (mmoles of ethylene/plant/growing season) averaged over four Rhizobium strains from 14.5 in the well‐watered to 3.7 in the droughted regime. This decrease in N fixation capacity did not decrease seed yields of droughted plants below those of well‐watered plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation was lower in droughted cowpea plants (15 mg/plant at flowering) than in well-watered plots (175 mg/plant at flowering).

Treatment
droughted plantse1
Outcome
nodulatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
15 mg/plante1
Qualifier
at floweringe1
Comparator
well‐watered plotse1
Setting
fieldt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum nodulation of 175 mg/plant was observed at flowering in the well‐watered plots versus 15 mg/plant in the droughted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Field‐Grown California Cowpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulation did not differ significantly between water regimes after the flowering stage.

Treatment
water regimese2
Outcome
nodulatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
Following this development stagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“Following this development stage, there was no significant difference in nodulation between water regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1037 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum total nitrogenase activity of well-watered cowpea plants was 22.5 and 18.8 µmoles of ethylene per plant per hour at flowering and pod-fill.

Treatment
well‐watered plantse3
Outcome
total nitrogenase activitye3
Value
22.5 and 18.8 µmoles of ethylene/plant/houre3
Qualifier
at flowering and pod‐fille3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum total nitrogenase activity was 22.5 and 18.8 µmoles of ethylene/plant/hour, respectively at flowering and pod‐fill in the well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the dry regime, maximum nitrogenase activity of cowpea was 5.3 and 4.5 µmoles of ethylene per plant per hour at pod-fill and pod yellowing.

Treatment
dry regimee4
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye4
Value
5.3 and 4.5 µmoles ethylene/plant/houre4
Qualifier
at pod‐fill and pod yellowing stages of maturitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“The dry regime by contrast achieved a maximum nitrogenase activity of 5.3 and 4.5 µmoles ethylene/plant/hour at pod‐fill and pod yellowing stages of maturity, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogenase activity of cowpea averaged over four Rhizobium strains was significantly reduced under drought, from 14.5 to 3.7 mmoles of ethylene per plant per growing season.

Treatment
droughted regimee5
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume5symbiont
Outcome
total nitrogenase activitye5
Direction
reductione5
Value
3.7e5
Qualifier
mmoles of ethylene/plant/growing seasone5
Comparator
well‐waterede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“Consequently, there was a significant reduction in total nitrogenase activity (mmoles of ethylene/plant/growing season) averaged over four Rhizobium strains from 14.5 in the well‐watered to 3.7 in the droughted regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yields of droughted cowpea plants did not decrease below those of well-watered plants despite lower nitrogen fixation capacity.

Treatment
droughted plantse6
Outcome
seed yieldse6
Direction
did not decreasee6
Comparator
well‐watered plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cowpea, ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), is considered a drought‐tolerant legume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“This decrease in N fixation capacity did not decrease seed yields of droughted plants below those of well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1702 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

irrigation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.