Paper · 2018 · Makara Journal of Science

Identification of Drought-tolerant Local Cowpea Varieties of Southwest Maluku (Indonesia)

Karuwal, Ritha Lusian; Suharsono, Suharsono; Tjahjoleksono, Aris; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Cowpeas grown in Southwest Maluku have local potential due to their diversity and ability to adapt to drought stress conditions that otherwise cause low productivity. The purpose of this study was to identify of local cowpea varieties of Southwest Maluku that show tolerance to drought. The experimental samples were seven local varieties and threereference cultivars. The drought stress treatment was altered watering periods, i.e., every two (P0) and ten days (P1) from growth to harvest. The results of this research showed that a ten-day watering period significantly decreased plant height, number of leaves, number of root nodules, root and shoot dry weight, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, relative water content, media water content, chlorophyll content, and number and weight of seeds perplant. Drought stress treatment increased proline content and root length. Correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between plant height with all variables, except for root length, proline content, and weight of seedsper plant. The correlation and cluster analyses showed that the KM7 variety is a drought tolerant genotype among the local cowpea varieties from Southwest Maluku. Therefore, the KM7 variety can be used as plant material in future breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-day watering reduced cowpea growth, physiological traits and seed production.

Treatment
ten-day watering periode0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, number of root nodulese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a ten-day watering period significantly decreased plant height, number of leaves, number of root nodules, root and shoot dry weight, photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, relative water content, media water content, chlorophyll content, and number and weight of seeds perplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased cowpea proline content and root length.

Treatment
Drought stress treatmente0
Outcome
proline content and root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress treatment increased proline content and root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea plant height correlated significantly with all measured variables except root length, proline content and seed weight.

Organ / stage
plante0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Qualifier
except for root length, proline content, and weight of seedsper plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height with all variables, except for root length, proline content, and weight of seedsper plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KM7 was identified as a drought tolerant local cowpea variety.

Material
KM7e0
Outcome
drought tolerant genotypee0
Setting
Southwest Malukue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the KM7 variety is a drought tolerant genotype among the local cowpea varieties from Southwest Maluku”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed KM7 as material for future breeding.

Material
KM7e0
Outcome
can be used as plant material in future breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the KM7 variety can be used as plant material in future breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–47 · show in text ↑

irrigation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.