Paper · 2005 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Impact of viscose pulp industry effluent and seed inoculants on cowpea yield and quality

SUGUNA DEVAKUMARI M; RUPAVATHI P S; ARUNA DEVI K

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effluent obtained from South India Viscose Industries Ltd., was analysed and found to be rich in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, trace elements and had EC below the critical limit fixed for irrigation. In order to assess the impact of viscose pulp industry effluent and Rhizobium and phosphobacteria seed inoculant on cowpen production, a pot culture study was conducted. From the study, it was concluded that, the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effluent was rich in organic matter and several nutrients, with electrical conductivity below the irrigation limit.

Outcome
organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, trace elementse0
Direction
riche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The effluent obtained from South India Viscose Industries Ltd., was analysed and found to be rich in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, trace elements and had EC below the critical limit fixed for irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined effluent irrigation and Rhizobium plus phosphobacteria seed treatment improved cowpea germination.

Treatment
effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved cowpea nodule number.

Treatment
effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved cowpea yield.

Treatment
effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved cowpea 100-seed weight.

Treatment
effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

47 papers: 47 positive, 0 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.