Abstract
The effluent obtained from South India Viscose Industries Ltd., was analysed and found to be rich in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, trace elements and had EC below the critical limit fixed for irrigation. In order to assess the impact of viscose pulp industry effluent and Rhizobium and phosphobacteria seed inoculant on cowpen production, a pot culture study was conducted. From the study, it was concluded that, the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The effluent was rich in organic matter and several nutrients, with electrical conductivity below the irrigation limit.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The effluent obtained from South India Viscose Industries Ltd., was analysed and found to be rich in organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium, magnesium, trace elements and had EC below the critical limit fixed for irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined effluent irrigation and Rhizobium plus phosphobacteria seed treatment improved cowpea germination.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- phosphobacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- germination percentagee0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved cowpea nodule number.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- phosphobacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of nodulese0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved cowpea yield.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- phosphobacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment improved cowpea 100-seed weight.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatmente0
- Second interactor
- phosphobacteriae0symbiont
- Outcome
- 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the germination percentage, number of nodules and yield and 100 seed weight were better under effluent irrigation along with Rhizobium + phosphobacteria seed treatment”
t0“cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Rhizobium · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
46 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →seed treatment · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →irrigation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →seed treatment · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →irrigation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →seed treatment · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.