Paper · 1999 · Photosynthetica

Effect of Rhizobium Sp. Inoculation on N2-Fixing and Photosynthetic Activities of Two Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] Genotypes

D. Lippi; M.R. De Paolis; M. Osmi; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Time course of symbiotic N2-fixing and photosynthetic activities during vegetative growth from 30 d after plantation until pod set was measured in the CB5 and 7964 cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes of contrasting senescence traits. At emergence, seedlings were inoculated with a "non-cowpea miscellany" Rhizobium strain generally used to inoculate Cicer arietinum. Maximum N2-fixing activity occurred in inoculated CB5 and 7964 plants about 54 and 68 d after plantation, respectively. A similar temporal shift of maximum was found for net photosynthetic rate (P N), confirming a good coordination between the two processes. A higher P N was found from the first measurements in inoculated plants of both genotypes as compared with uninoculated plants. Apparently, the maximum activity of both N2-fixation and P N was timed to occur at a particular stage of plant ontogeny correlating the high N supply with the high N demand by the plant. Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect partitioning coefficients of biomass to various plant organs but extended leaf longevity by about 10 d in the CB5 genotype, retarding thus the monocarpic senescence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated CB5 reached maximum N2 fixation about 54 days after planting.

Material
CB5e0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
Maximum N2-fixing activitye0
Value
54e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N2-fixing activity occurred in inoculated CB5 and 7964 plants about 54 and 68 d after plantation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–498 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizobium strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated 7964 reached maximum N2 fixation about 68 days after planting.

Material
7964e0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
Maximum N2-fixing activitye0
Value
68 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N2-fixing activity occurred in inoculated CB5 and 7964 plants about 54 and 68 d after plantation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–498 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizobium strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum net photosynthetic rate showed a similar temporal shift.

Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
similar temporal shift of maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar temporal shift of maximum was found for net photosynthetic rate (P N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizobium strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants of both cowpea genotypes had higher net photosynthetic rates than uninoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Outcome
P Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher P N was found from the first measurements in inoculated plants of both genotypes as compared with uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizobium strain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect biomass partitioning coefficients.

Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
partitioning coefficients of biomass to various plant organse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect partitioning coefficients of biomass to various plant organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation extended CB5 leaf longevity by about 10 days.

Material
CB5e0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
leaf longevitye0
Direction
extendede0
Value
10 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extended leaf longevity by about 10 d in the CB5 genotype, retarding thus the monocarpic senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect partitioning coefficients of biomass to various plant organs but extended leaf longevity by about 10 d in the CB5 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1126 · show in text ↑
e2

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum N fixation and photosynthesis appeared timed to plant ontogeny and coordinated N supply with demand.

Outcome
maximum activity of both N2-fixation and P Ne0
Qualifier
particular stage of plant ontogenye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparently, the maximum activity of both N2-fixation and P N was timed to occur at a particular stage of plant ontogeny correlating the high N supply with the high N demand by the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 26 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Rhizobium · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.