Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed coating agents significantly reduced shoot length of all treated V. unguiculata seedlings compared with control.

A claim from Effects of Seed Coating Agents on Some Agronomic Properties and Rhizobacterial Population of Vigna unguiculata · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed coating agents significantly reduced shoot length of all treated V. unguiculata seedlings compared with control.

Taxon
V. unguiculataVigna unguiculatae3
Treatment
seed coating agentse3
Outcome
shoot lengthe3
Direction
significant reductionse3
Comparator
controle3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“no significant effect (p > 0.05) of seed coating agents was observed on the average number of leaves of growing V. unguiculata seedling but significant reductions (p < 0.05) were observed in the shoot length of all the treated seedling as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1526

Title

Effects of Seed Coating Agents on Some Agronomic Properties and Rhizobacterial Population of Vigna unguiculata

W. T. Aborisade; Z. B. AbdulSalam; S. A. Abdulmumini BADEGGI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENT 2021. doi:10.35849/bjare202102008

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-fa040fa47463d8771e66140e5669303788f8abe52bffea415213a2853fa450c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.