Paper · 2006

The research exploration to the effect of controlling rice sheath blight with Bacillus spp. Drt-11.

Min Chen; Kang Xiaohui

16
claims
38
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A part characteristic of biology and fermentation of Bacillus spp.Drt-11 are studied.The results showed that the best fermentation medium are firstly fish power(36.2×10~8 cfu/ mL) and secondly peanut powder(19.6×10~8 cfu/ mL).The best fermentation conditions are: temperature 31-34 ℃,the whisking rate 180-200 r/ min,pH 7.2-7.3,oxygen rate 1∶1.Under those conditions,the quality of Bacillus spp.Drt-11 could reach over 10~(8-9) cfu/ mL in fermented liquid.The more time sclerotia treated in the fermented liquid of Bacillus spp.Drt-11 were,the lower rate of germination was.Treating over 24 h in the fermented liquid, the germination rate would reduce by 40 %-60 %.And the diameter of colony was 13.9 % of CK.The growth of hyphea is restrained in evidence.The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly.Mostly it is manifested by the increase of biomass of the rice plant.And the pure weight of overground and underground,as well as the height of plant is increased by 5.17 %,25.0 % and 4.09 % separately.The control effect of rice sheath blight with antagonism Drt-11 fermented liquid in the fields maintained about 80 %-85 %,corresponding to the effect of bio-fungicide 20 % Jinggangmeisu WP.According to the result of practical area test,rice yields are increased by treated with Drt-11 fermented liquid.Using three mixed rates to control rice sheath blight,the control effect would be 90.43 %, 92.05 % and 86.38 %.Their control effects were higher than that using only Drt-11,and 20 % Jinggangmeisu WP,respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fish powder was the best fermentation medium for Bacillus spp. Drt-11, giving 36.2×10~8 cfu/mL.

Treatment
fish powere1
Outcome
best fermentation mediume1
Value
36.2×10~8 cfu/ mLe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the best fermentation medium are firstly fish power(36.2×10~8 cfu/ mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–179 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut powder was the second-best fermentation medium, giving 19.6×10~8 cfu/mL.

Treatment
peanut powdere2
Outcome
best fermentation mediume2
Value
19.6×10~8 cfu/ mLe2
Qualifier
secondlye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e2

“the best fermentation medium are firstly fish power(36.2×10~8 cfu/ mL) and secondly peanut powder(19.6×10~8 cfu/ mL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–225 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best fermentation conditions were 31-34 ℃, whisking at 180-200 r/min, pH 7.2-7.3 and oxygen rate 1∶1.

Outcome
best fermentation conditionse3
Value
31-34 ℃e3
Qualifier
whisking rate 180-200 r/ min,pH 7.2-7.3,oxygen rate 1∶1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best fermentation conditions are: temperature 31-34 ℃,the whisking rate 180-200 r/ min,pH 7.2-7.3,oxygen rate 1∶1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–343 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the best conditions, Bacillus spp. Drt-11 reached over 10^8 to 10^9 cfu/mL in fermented liquid.

Interactor
Bacillus spp.Drt-11e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
quality of Bacillus spp.Drt-11e4
Value
over 10~(8-9) cfu/ mLe4
Setting
fermented liquide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under those conditions,the quality of Bacillus spp.Drt-11 could reach over 10~(8-9) cfu/ mL in fermented liquid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–455 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer time of sclerotia in the fermented liquid of Bacillus spp. Drt-11 was associated with a lower germination rate.

Organ / stage
sclerotiae5
Treatment
fermented liquid of Bacillus spp.Drt-11e5
Interactor
Bacillus spp.Drt-11e5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rate of germinatione5
Direction
lowere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e5

“The more time sclerotia treated in the fermented liquid of Bacillus spp.Drt-11 were,the lower rate of germination was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treating sclerotia for over 24 h in the fermented liquid reduced germination rate by 40-60%.

Treatment
Treating over 24 h in the fermented liquide6
Outcome
germination ratee6
Direction
reducee6
Value
40 %-60 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treating over 24 h in the fermented liquid, the germination rate would reduce by 40 %-60 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism by Drt-11 reduced colony diameter to 13.9% of the control (CK).

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11e0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
diameter of colonye7
Direction
decreaseinferrede7
Value
13.9 %e7
Comparator
CKe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e7

“And the diameter of colony was 13.9 % of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–708 · show in text ↑
e0

“The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism by Drt-11 restrained the growth of hyphae.

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11e0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of hypheae1
Direction
restrainede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“The growth of hyphea is restrained in evidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism by Drt-11 increased overground pure weight of rice by 5.17%.

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11e0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pure weight of overgrounde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
5.17 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819 · show in text ↑
e2

“And the pure weight of overground and underground,as well as the height of plant is increased by 5.17 %,25.0 % and 4.09 % separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism by Drt-11 increased underground pure weight of rice by 25.0%.

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11e0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pure weight of overground and undergrounde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
25.0 %e2
Qualifier
undergrounde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819 · show in text ↑
e2

“And the pure weight of overground and underground,as well as the height of plant is increased by 5.17 %,25.0 % and 4.09 % separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonism by Drt-11 increased plant height of rice by 4.09%.

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11e0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
height of plante2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.09 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The antagonism Drt-11 promoted the growth of rice plant greatly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–819 · show in text ↑
e2

“And the pure weight of overground and underground,as well as the height of plant is increased by 5.17 %,25.0 % and 4.09 % separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermented liquid of Drt-11 maintained rice sheath blight control at about 80-85% in the fields, comparable to 20% Jinggangmeisu WP.

Treatment
antagonism Drt-11 fermented liquide1
Interactor
Drt-11e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control effecte1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
about 80 %-85 %e1
Comparator
bio-fungicide 20 % Jinggangmeisu WPe1
Setting
in the fieldse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The control effect of rice sheath blight with antagonism Drt-11 fermented liquid in the fields maintained about 80 %-85 %,corresponding to the effect of bio-fungicide 20 % Jinggangmeisu WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1210 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with Drt-11 fermented liquid increased rice yields in a practical area test.

Treatment
Drt-11 fermented liquide0
Interactor
Drt-11e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rice yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to the result of practical area test,rice yields are increased by treated with Drt-11 fermented liquid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1323 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three mixed rates controlled rice sheath blight with control effects of 90.43%, 92.05% and 86.38%.

Treatment
three mixed ratese1
Outcome
control effecte1
Value
90.43 %, 92.05 % and 86.38 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using three mixed rates to control rice sheath blight,the control effect would be 90.43 %, 92.05 % and 86.38 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control effects of the three mixed rates were higher than with Drt-11 alone.

Treatment
three mixed ratese1
Interactor
Drt-11e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control effectse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
using only Drt-11e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using three mixed rates to control rice sheath blight,the control effect would be 90.43 %, 92.05 % and 86.38 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1434 · show in text ↑
e2

“Their control effects were higher than that using only Drt-11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control effects of the three mixed rates were higher than with 20% Jinggangmeisu WP.

Treatment
three mixed ratese1
Outcome
control effectse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
20 % Jinggangmeisu WPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using three mixed rates to control rice sheath blight,the control effect would be 90.43 %, 92.05 % and 86.38 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1434 · show in text ↑
e2

“Their control effects were higher than that using only Drt-11,and 20 % Jinggangmeisu WP,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1535 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 56 positive, 32 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

processing · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.