Paper · 2009

Agronomic Management for Pigeon Pea Under Drought Conditions

R.V. Selvi; S. Srinivasan; M. Ramasamy; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2004 and kharif 2005 in rainfed conditions on red soil to study the effect of different drought management practices such as application of FYM in soil, seed coating with 2% solution of CaCl2 or KH2PO4 foliar spray of 2% urea, 2% KCl at flowering, cultural mulch (utilizing the crop residues as mulch material), opening shallow furrow between two rows and water spray at flowering on the growth and yield of redgram variety, VBN 1 in red soil of Pudukkottai district of Tamil Nadu under rainfed conditions. These practices were compared with the normal practice of application of recommended dose of fertilizer alone. From the two years of study, it was found that, application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two times records the maximum yield of 568 kg/ha and 557 kg/ha during 2004 and 2005 respectively. This was comparable to application of RDF alone. The net profit and BCR were Rs.4060/ha; 1.5 and Rs.4015; 1.61 during 2004 and 2005 respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus cultural mulch twice gave maximum redgram yield of 568 kg/ha in 2004.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two timese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
568 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2004e0
Comparator
application of recommended dose of fertilizer alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two times records the maximum yield of 568 kg/ha and 557 kg/ha during 2004 and 2005 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“These practices were compared with the normal practice of application of recommended dose of fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus cultural mulch twice gave maximum redgram yield of 557 kg/ha in 2005.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two timese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
557 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2005e0
Comparator
application of recommended dose of fertilizer alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two times records the maximum yield of 568 kg/ha and 557 kg/ha during 2004 and 2005 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“These practices were compared with the normal practice of application of recommended dose of fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched RDF yield was comparable to RDF alone.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two timese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
application of RDF alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was comparable to application of RDF alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + cultural mulch two times records the maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–817 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net profit under the reported practice was Rs.4060/ha in 2004 and Rs.4015 in 2005.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
net profite0
Value
Rs.4060/hae0
Qualifier
2004 and 2005e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The net profit and BCR were Rs.4060/ha; 1.5 and Rs.4015; 1.61 during 2004 and 2005 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit-cost ratio was 1.5 in 2004 and 1.61 in 2005.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
BCRe0
Value
1.5e0
Qualifier
2004 and 2005e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
e0

“The net profit and BCR were Rs.4060/ha; 1.5 and Rs.4015; 1.61 during 2004 and 2005 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1024 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.