Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.6 PEF with sugarcane trash mulch at 5 t/ha significantly increased pigeonpea yield.

A claim from Response of Pigeon Pea to Drip Irrigation and Mulching · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 0.6 PEF with sugarcane trash mulch at 5 t/ha significantly increased pigeonpea yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
0.6 PEF through drip irrigation with sugarcane trash mulch @ 5 t/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Setting
college farm, CAET, NAU, Dediapadae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growing of rabi pigeonpea resulted significantly higher yield due to 0.6 significantly higher in 0.6 PEF through drip irrigation with sugarcane trash mulch @ 5 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–819
e1

“college farm, CAET, NAU, Dediapada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–130

Title

Response of Pigeon Pea to Drip Irrigation and Mulching

M.A. Solanki; A.L. Chalodia; M.H. Fadadu; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.011

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-de491b90df7ee3cc57081f0acca5c9f6c1886fe2235e6cfca0a5bc06ee5c9cb3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

mulching · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

51 papers: 51 positive, 0 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.