Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment improved pigeonpea grain yield by 99.9% over control.

A claim from Effect of moisture conservation practices on growth and yield of pearl millet + pigeonpea intercropping system · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment improved pigeonpea grain yield by 99.9% over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
green leaf manure with maize residue mulche0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
99.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improvement in grain yield of pearl millet and pigeonpea was 30.18 and 99.9% respectively, by green leaf manure with maize residue mulch compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–845

Title

Effect of moisture conservation practices on growth and yield of pearl millet + pigeonpea intercropping system

R. L. Rajput; Narendra Singh Bhadouriya Legume Research - An International Journal 2018. doi:10.18805/lr-3879

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e95bb0d19487ba1bd72369d24b0af88ff20b868d052afdea375255cc9b8e59dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.