Paper · 2009 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Efficient utilization of limited available water in wheat through proper irrigation scheduling and integrated nutrient management under different cropping systems in a vertisol.

K. K. Bandyopadhyay; Probir Kumar Ghosh; K. M. Hati; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Limited availability of irrigation water is one of the major constraints for higher productivity of wheat in Vertisols of central India. There is a need for efficient utilization of the limited water through improving the water use efficiency of wheat. A field experiment was undertaken to study root growth, yield and water use efficiency of wheat grown on a deep Vertisol under soybean-wheat, soybean+sorghum-wheat and sorghum-wheat cropping systems with two irrigation schedules i.e. 0.8 and 0.6 IW/CPE and six different nutrient management strategies. The results showed that yield and water use efficiency of wheat under soybean-wheat and soybean+sorghum-wheat system were more than the sorghum-wheat system because of better root growth and higher soil water extraction in the former cropping systems. The root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with the soil water extraction (R2= 0.32*), grain yield (R2= 0.84**) and water use efficiency (R2=0.79**) of wheat. Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE significantly improved the soil water extraction, root length density and grain yield of wheat over irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE. Integrated use of 75% NPK and farmyard manure @ 5 Mg ha−1 or poultry manure @ 1.5 Mg ha−1 or phosphocompost @ 5 Mg ha−1 to rainy season crops and 75% NPK to wheat significantly improved the root length density, yield and water use efficiency of wheat over application of 100% NPK to both the crops leading to a saving of 25% fertilizer NPK in both the seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat under soybean-wheat and soybean+sorghum-wheat systems had higher yield and water use efficiency than under sorghum-wheat, through better root growth and soil water extraction.

Treatment
soybean-wheat and soybean+sorghum-wheat systeme1
Outcome
yield and water use efficiencye1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
because of better root growth and higher soil water extractione1
Comparator
sorghum-wheat systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield and water use efficiency of wheat under soybean-wheat and soybean+sorghum-wheat system were more than the sorghum-wheat system because of better root growth and higher soil water extraction in the former cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–806 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with soil water extraction.

Organ / stage
roote2
Outcome
soil water extractione2
Value
R2= 0.32*e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with the soil water extraction (R2= 0.32*), grain yield (R2= 0.84**) and water use efficiency (R2=0.79**) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–984 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with grain yield.

Organ / stage
roote2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Value
R2= 0.84**e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with the soil water extraction (R2= 0.32*), grain yield (R2= 0.84**) and water use efficiency (R2=0.79**) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–984 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with water use efficiency.

Organ / stage
roote2
Outcome
water use efficiencye2
Value
R2=0.79**e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The root length density of wheat was significantly correlated with the soil water extraction (R2= 0.32*), grain yield (R2= 0.84**) and water use efficiency (R2=0.79**) of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE significantly improved soil water extraction, root length density and grain yield of wheat over 0.6 IW/CPE.

Treatment
Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPEe3
Outcome
soil water extraction, root length density and grain yielde3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPEe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE significantly improved the soil water extraction, root length density and grain yield of wheat over irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated use of 75% NPK with farmyard, poultry or phosphocompost manure significantly improved root length density, yield and water use efficiency of wheat over 100% NPK.

Treatment
Integrated use of 75% NPK and farmyard manure @ 5 Mg ha−1 or poultry manure @ 1.5 Mg ha−1 or phosphocompost @ 5 Mg ha−1e4
Outcome
root length density, yield and water use efficiencye4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
application of 100% NPKe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated use of 75% NPK and farmyard manure @ 5 Mg ha−1 or poultry manure @ 1.5 Mg ha−1 or phosphocompost @ 5 Mg ha−1 to rainy season crops and 75% NPK to wheat significantly improved the root length density, yield and water use efficiency of wheat over application of 100% NPK to both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management saved 25% of fertilizer NPK in wheat over both seasons.

Treatment
Integrated use of 75% NPKe4
Outcome
fertilizer NPKe5
Direction
savinge5
Value
25%e5
Comparator
application of 100% NPKe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Integrated use of 75% NPK and farmyard manure @ 5 Mg ha−1 or poultry manure @ 1.5 Mg ha−1 or phosphocompost @ 5 Mg ha−1 to rainy season crops and 75% NPK to wheat significantly improved the root length density, yield and water use efficiency of wheat over application of 100% NPK to both the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1434 · show in text ↑
e5

“leading to a saving of 25% fertilizer NPK in both the seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1496 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.