Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of different components of SRI on yield, quality, nutrient accumulation and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) in tarai belt of northern India

ANCHAL DASS; SUBHASH CHANDRA

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a Typic Hapludoll soil in Indo-gangetic plains of India during the 2008 and 2009 rainy seasons to find out the effect of irrigation schedules and plant spacing on yield, quality, nutrient uptake and economics of two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) varieties under system of rice intensification (SRI) and compare the performance of SRI with conventional transplanting. Treatments under SRI included 12 combinations of 3 irriga- tion schedules, viz. irrigation at 1, 3 and 5 day(s) after disappearance of standing water (DADSW), 2 spacings (20 cm 20 cm, 25 cm 25 cm) and 2 varieties (Pant Dhan 4, Arize 6444), alongwith two control treatments of con- ventional cultivation of each variety. The experiment was set in a RBD with three replications. Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW increased uptake of N, P and K in grains, which enhanced grain protein content and milling percentage, and improved grain yield by 8.6 and 5.9% over 5 DADSW (5.82 t/ha), respectively. Net returns and B:C ratio were also better with irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW. Wider spacing resulted in 4.2% higher yield with better grain quality and 10.8% higher net returns over closer spacing. Yield-wise and profit-wise, both the varieties were suit- able for cultivation under SRI. However, Arize 6444 recorded higher N uptake and protein content. The uptake of P and K was higher in grains of Pant Dhan 4 which showed higher milling percentage. Between two methods, SRI improved N, P and K uptake, milling percentage and protein content. Grain yield was 16.9% higher under SRI compared to conventional method (5.22 t/ha). Due to lower cost of production and higher yields, SRI fetched 56% higher net returns over conventional transplanting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW increased uptake of N, P and K in rice grains relative to 5 DADSW.

Treatment
Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSWe0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and K in grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
5 DADSWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW increased uptake of N, P and K in grains, which enhanced grain protein content and milling percentage, and improved grain yield by 8.6 and 5.9% over 5 DADSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW enhanced grain protein content and milling percentage in rice relative to 5 DADSW.

Treatment
Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSWe0
Outcome
grain protein content and milling percentagee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
5 DADSWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW increased uptake of N, P and K in grains, which enhanced grain protein content and milling percentage, and improved grain yield by 8.6 and 5.9% over 5 DADSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 3 DADSW improved rice grain yield by 5.9% over 5 DADSW (5.82 t/ha).

Treatment
Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSWe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
5.9%e0
Qualifier
3 DADSWe0
Comparator
5 DADSWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW increased uptake of N, P and K in grains, which enhanced grain protein content and milling percentage, and improved grain yield by 8.6 and 5.9% over 5 DADSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns and benefit-cost ratio were also better with irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW.

Treatment
irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSWe0
Outcome
Net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns and B:C ratio were also better with irrigation at 1 and 3 DADSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing gave 4.2% higher rice yield than closer spacing.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.2%e0
Comparator
closer spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing resulted in 4.2% higher yield with better grain quality and 10.8% higher net returns over closer spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing gave better rice grain quality than closer spacing.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
closer spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing resulted in 4.2% higher yield with better grain quality and 10.8% higher net returns over closer spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing gave 10.8% higher net returns than closer spacing.

Treatment
Wider spacinge0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.8%e0
Comparator
closer spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing resulted in 4.2% higher yield with better grain quality and 10.8% higher net returns over closer spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety Arize 6444 recorded higher N uptake and protein content.

Material
Arize 6444e0
Outcome
N uptake and protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arize 6444 recorded higher N uptake and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains of Pant Dhan 4 had higher uptake of P and K.

Material
Pant Dhan 4e0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
uptake of P and Ke0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of P and K was higher in grains of Pant Dhan 4 which showed higher milling percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pant Dhan 4 showed higher milling percentage.

Material
Pant Dhan 4e0
Outcome
milling percentagee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of P and K was higher in grains of Pant Dhan 4 which showed higher milling percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Both varieties were suitable for cultivation under SRI in terms of yield and profit.

Outcome
suit- able for cultivation under SRIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield-wise and profit-wise, both the varieties were suit- able for cultivation under SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI improved N, P and K uptake compared with the conventional method.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between two methods, SRI improved N, P and K uptake, milling percentage and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI improved milling percentage and protein content compared with the conventional method.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
milling percentage and protein contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between two methods, SRI improved N, P and K uptake, milling percentage and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was 16.9% higher under SRI than under the conventional method (5.22 t/ha).

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.9%e0
Qualifier
5.22 t/hae0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was 16.9% higher under SRI compared to conventional method (5.22 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI fetched 56% higher net returns than conventional transplanting due to lower production cost and higher yields.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
conventional transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to lower cost of production and higher yields, SRI fetched 56% higher net returns over conventional transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–115 · show in text ↑

density · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.