Abstract
Field trials were conducted to study the efficacy of different formulations of quinalphos and endosulfan against sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin. and sor-ghum midge Contarinia sorghicola Coq. The effectiveness of the various insecticid31 treatments against C. partellus was based on per cent leaf injury and dead heart formation at 30 and 45 days after germination and stem tunnelling at harvest. Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G gave good control followed by quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray and quinalphos 1.5 per cent dust. Efficacy of different insecticidal form1.ilations against midge was based on grain damage. Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray was the most effective followed by quinalphqs 1.5 per cent dust. Grain and fodder yield were maximum in 0.1 per cent quinalphos spray followed by quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 5 G gave good control of sorghum stem borer.
- Treatment
- Quinalphos 5 Ge0
- Interactor
- C. partellus
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=60)
Chilo partelluse0pest - Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- goode0
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The effectiveness of the various insecticid31 treatments against C. partellus was based on per cent leaf injury and dead heart formation at 30 and 45 days after germination and stem tunnelling at harvest. Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G gave good control”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulfan 4 G gave good control of sorghum stem borer.
- Treatment
- endosulfan 4 Ge0
- Interactor
- C. partellusChilo partelluse0pest
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- goode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effectiveness of the various insecticid31 treatments against C. partellus was based on per cent leaf injury and dead heart formation at 30 and 45 days after germination and stem tunnelling at harvest. Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G gave good control”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray followed the granular treatments in borer control.
- Treatment
- quinalphos 0.1 per cent spraye0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partelluse1pest
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 Ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G gave good control followed by quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray and quinalphos 1.5 per cent dust”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 1.5 per cent dust followed the granular treatments in borer control.
- Treatment
- quinalphos 1.5 per cent duste0
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partelluse1pest
- Outcome
- controle0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 Ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G gave good control followed by quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray and quinalphos 1.5 per cent dust”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray was most effective against sorghum midge grain damage.
- Treatment
- Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spraye0
- Interactor
- Contarinia sorghicolae1pest
- Outcome
- grain damagee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of different insecticidal form1.ilations against midge was based on grain damage. Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray was the most effective followed by quinalphqs 1.5 per cent dust”
e1“sor-ghum midge Contarinia sorghicola Coq.”
e2“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Quinalphos 1.5 per cent dust ranked second against sorghum midge grain damage.
- Treatment
- quinalphqs 1.5 per cent duste0
- Interactor
- Contarinia sorghicolae1pest
- Outcome
- grain damagee0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Efficacy of different insecticidal form1.ilations against midge was based on grain damage. Quinalphos 0.1 per cent spray was the most effective followed by quinalphqs 1.5 per cent dust”
e1“sor-ghum midge Contarinia sorghicola Coq.”
e2“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain and fodder yields were maximum with 0.1 per cent quinalphos spray.
- Treatment
- 0.1 per cent quinalphos spraye0
- Outcome
- Grain and fodder yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 Ge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain and fodder yield were maximum in 0.1 per cent quinalphos spray followed by quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain and fodder yields followed the spray treatment under quinalphos 5 G.
- Treatment
- quinalphos 5 Ge0
- Outcome
- Grain and fodder yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- 0.1 per cent quinalphos spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain and fodder yield were maximum in 0.1 per cent quinalphos spray followed by quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain and fodder yields followed the spray treatment under endosulfan 4 G.
- Treatment
- endosulfan 4 Ge0
- Outcome
- Grain and fodder yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- 0.1 per cent quinalphos spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain and fodder yield were maximum in 0.1 per cent quinalphos spray followed by quinalphos 5 G and endosulfan 4 G”
e1“sorghum stem borer Chilo partellus Swin.”
The same questions in other papers
quinalphos · Chilo partellus · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
endosulfan · Chilo partellus · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
endosulfan · yield · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
quinalphos · yield · SorghumResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →application · Chilo partellus · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · pest · SorghumResults agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.