Paper · 1993 · Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science

Response of a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stand to application of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and lime. 3. Foliar nutrient concentrations and stand development

G. Arnold; A. Van Diest

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 1985-88, a 25-yr-old Scots pine forest in Netherlands was limed and fertilized with P, K and Mg in a factoral design. This paper addresses effects of these treatments on foliar nutrient concentrations and tree growth. Stem volume increments of individual trees were measured. Average annual volume growth was estimated to be about 16 msuperscript 3/ha, which may be a slight underestimation. P and K showed increased foliar concentrations immediately after treatment and were the only elements that significantly increased volume growth in 1988-91. Additional annual volume growth of individual trees brought about by P and K corresponded with 0.9 and 2.2 msuperscript 3/ha, respectively. Foliar Mg and Ca increased later and insignificantly reduced and increased volume growth, respectively. Lime and Mg applications tended to lower foliar N. When absolute foliar concentrations and element ratios were compared to Dutch and German standards, it appeared that application of some of these standards in present research would not always have given a fully correct prediction of growth responses to nutrient additions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K fertilization increased foliar nutrient concentrations in the Scots pine stand immediately after treatment.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
P and Ke0
Outcome
foliar concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“P and K showed increased foliar concentrations immediately after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K were the only elements that significantly increased volume growth of Scots pine in 1988-91.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
P and Ke0
Outcome
volume growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“P and K showed increased foliar concentrations immediately after treatment and were the only elements that significantly increased volume growth in 1988-91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization brought about an additional annual volume growth of 0.9 m3/ha in individual Scots pine trees.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
annual volume growthe0
Direction
Additionale0
Value
0.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Additional annual volume growth of individual trees brought about by P and K corresponded with 0.9 and 2.2 msuperscript 3/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization brought about an additional annual volume growth of 2.2 m3/ha in individual Scots pine trees.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Ke0
Outcome
annual volume growthe0
Direction
Additionale0
Value
2.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Additional annual volume growth of individual trees brought about by P and K corresponded with 0.9 and 2.2 msuperscript 3/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg application insignificantly reduced volume growth of Scots pine.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Mge0
Outcome
volume growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar Mg and Ca increased later and insignificantly reduced and increased volume growth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca application insignificantly increased volume growth of Scots pine.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Cae0
Outcome
volume growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar Mg and Ca increased later and insignificantly reduced and increased volume growth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime and Mg applications tended to lower foliar N in Scots pine.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Treatment
Lime and Mg applicationse0
Outcome
foliar Ne0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lime and Mg applications tended to lower foliar N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average annual volume growth of the Scots pine stand was estimated at about 16 m3/ha.

Taxon
Scots pinePinus sylvestrist0
Outcome
Average annual volume growthe0
Value
about 16 msuperscript 3/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus sylvestris
Pinus sylvestris · TaxonHello, I am Bruce on Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“Average annual volume growth was estimated to be about 16 msuperscript 3/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–354 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying some Dutch and German foliar standards to this stand would not always have correctly predicted growth responses to nutrient additions.

Outcome
prediction of growth responsese1
Comparator
Dutch and German standardse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“absolute foliar concentrations and element ratios were compared to Dutch and German standards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of some of these standards in present research would not always have given a fully correct prediction of growth responses to nutrient additions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1119 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

potassium · growth · Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.