Paper · 1989 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry

Govindaiah; N. Suryanarayana; D. D. Sharma; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments have shown that mulching of green leaves of pongamia and neem in the soil has significantly reduced the incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) and increased the plant growth as well as leaf yield. In all the four trials conducted, mulching of pongamia leaves was found to be superior over neem leaves in all the parameters studied. In pongamia the leaf yield was increased by 28.44–41.71% followed by 16.13–38.67% in case of neem leaves mulched over control. The number of root-knots and egg masses were found to be minimum in pongamia and neem, but maximum was observed in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia leaf mulch significantly reduced root-knot nematode incidence.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
mulching of green leaves of pongamiae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching of green leaves of pongamia and neem in the soil has significantly reduced the incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf mulch significantly reduced root-knot nematode incidence.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
neeme0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching of green leaves of pongamia and neem in the soil has significantly reduced the incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia mulch increased mulberry growth and leaf yield.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
mulching of green leaves of pongamiae0
Outcome
plant growth as well as leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mulching of green leaves of pongamia and neem in the soil has significantly reduced the incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) and increased the plant growth as well as leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem mulch increased mulberry growth and leaf yield.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
neeme0
Outcome
plant growth as well as leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“mulching of green leaves of pongamia and neem in the soil has significantly reduced the incidence of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) and increased the plant growth as well as leaf yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia mulch outperformed neem mulch across studied parameters.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
mulching of pongamia leavese0
Outcome
all the parameters studiede0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
neem leavese0

Verbatim

e0

“mulching of pongamia leaves was found to be superior over neem leaves in all the parameters studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pongamia mulch increased leaf yield by 28.44–41.71% versus control.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
pongamiae0
Outcome
leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.44–41.71%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In pongamia the leaf yield was increased by 28.44–41.71% followed by 16.13–38.67% in case of neem leaves mulched over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem mulch increased leaf yield by 16.13–38.67% versus control.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
neem leaves mulchede0
Outcome
leaf yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.13–38.67%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In pongamia the leaf yield was increased by 28.44–41.71% followed by 16.13–38.67% in case of neem leaves mulched over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-knots and egg masses were minimal under pongamia and neem mulch and maximal in control.

Taxon
Mulberryt0
Treatment
pongamia and neeme0
Outcome
number of root-knots and egg massese0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The number of root-knots and egg masses were found to be minimum in pongamia and neem, but maximum was observed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Mulching of Green Leaves for the Control of Root-Knot Nematode in Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · pest · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.