Paper · 2000 · Journal of Range Management

N and P Fertilization on Rangeland Production in Midwest Argentina

Juan C. Guevara; Carlos R. Stasi; Oscar R. Estevez; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Low soil nutrient status may be the major limiting factor to forage production in rangelands of the Mendoza plains 4 years out of 10. We studied vegetation responses to annual applications of N and P on such rangelands. Fertilizer application rates were 0 or 25 N and 0 or 11 P (kg ha-1) in a factorial arrangement. Dry matter production of grasses and palatable shrubs and crude protein (CP) content of grasses were determined annually from 1996 to 1998. Experimental plots received rains of 189, 278, and 346 mm during the 3 study years compared to mean growing season rainfall of 258 mm. Forage production was increased by N+P fertilization only in 1998 (1,390 vs 980 kg ha-1, P 0.05), producing 16.5 kg forage kg-1 N applied. Crude protein concentration was increased by N fertilization in 1997 (6.3 vs 5.3%, P < 0.05) and N+P application increased in 1998 (6.8 vs 5.7%, P < 0.05). Nitrogen and P application increased seasonal rain-use efficiency when the rainfall exceeded 300 mm. In 1998, the increase of grass production per kg N applied with and without P was 18.4 and 12.4 kg, respectively. The break-even point between rain and nutrients as the main primary production determinant on sandy soils in the central Mendoza plains is around 400 mm year-1 instead of 300 mm in other arid lands of the world. The value of meat increment derived from the N fertilization, with and without P application (US 0.07 ha-1 year-1 kg-1 N) was lower than the fertilizer cost (US 0.87 kg-1 N). A 5-fold increase in forage yields would be required to offset the cost of fertilizer. Fertilizer application did not increase forage production enough to be profitable for cattle production at present fertilizer and meat prices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N plus P fertilization increased forage production only in 1998, from 980 to 1,390 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
N+P fertilizatione0
Outcome
Forage productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1,390e0
Qualifier
only in 1998e0
Comparator
980 kg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Forage production was increased by N+P fertilization only in 1998 (1,390 vs 980 kg ha-1, P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1998 N plus P application produced 16.5 kg forage per kg N applied.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Outcome
foragee0
Value
16.5 kg forage kg-1 N appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“producing 16.5 kg forage kg-1 N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased grass crude protein concentration in 1997 from 5.3% to 6.3%.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
Crude protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.3e0
Comparator
5.3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein concentration was increased by N fertilization in 1997 (6.3 vs 5.3%, P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen plus phosphorus increased grass crude protein concentration in 1998 from 5.7% to 6.8%.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
N+P applicatione0
Outcome
Crude protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.8e0
Comparator
5.7%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein concentration was increased by N fertilization in 1997 (6.3 vs 5.3%, P < 0.05) and N+P application increased in 1998 (6.8 vs 5.7%, P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and phosphorus application increased seasonal rain-use efficiency when rainfall exceeded 300 mm.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
Nitrogen and P applicatione0
Outcome
seasonal rain-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
rainfall exceeded 300 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen and P application increased seasonal rain-use efficiency when the rainfall exceeded 300 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1998 grass production per kg N applied increased by 18.4 kg with P.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
with and without Pe0
Outcome
grass production per kg N appliede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18.4e0

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998, the increase of grass production per kg N applied with and without P was 18.4 and 12.4 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1998 grass production per kg N applied increased by 12.4 kg without P.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
without Pe0
Outcome
grass production per kg N appliede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.4 kge0

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998, the increase of grass production per kg N applied with and without P was 18.4 and 12.4 kg, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rain–nutrient break-even point for primary production on sandy soils of central Mendoza is around 400 mm year-1.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Outcome
break-even point between rain and nutrients as the main primary production determinante0
Value
400 mm year-1e0
Comparator
300 mme0
Setting
central Mendoza plainse0

Verbatim

e0

“The break-even point between rain and nutrients as the main primary production determinant on sandy soils in the central Mendoza plains is around 400 mm year-1 instead of 300 mm in other arid lands of the world”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated meat value derived from nitrogen fertilization was below fertilizer cost.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Outcome
value of meat incremente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
US 0.07 ha-1 year-1 kg-1 Ne0
Qualifier
US 0.87 kg-1 Ne0
Comparator
fertilizer coste0

Verbatim

e0

“The value of meat increment derived from the N fertilization, with and without P application (US 0.07 ha-1 year-1 kg-1 N) was lower than the fertilizer cost (US 0.87 kg-1 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A fivefold forage yield increase would be needed to cover fertilizer cost.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Outcome
forage yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5-folde0

Verbatim

e0

“A 5-fold increase in forage yields would be required to offset the cost of fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At current fertilizer and meat prices, fertilization was not profitable for cattle production.

Taxon
Rangelandt0
Treatment
Fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
profitable for cattle productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer application did not increase forage production enough to be profitable for cattle production at present fertilizer and meat prices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rangeland Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–45 · show in text ↑