Paper · 2000

Studies on seed rates and row spacing on rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in vindhya plateau of Madhya Pradesh

M. L. Tripathi; S. M. Kurmvanshi; H. S. Kushwaha

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted on rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in clay loam soils at Sagar (M.P.) during 1988–89 and 1989–90 to study the effect of seed rates and row spacing. Results revealed that grain and straw yields were maximum with 125 kg seed/ha mainly due to increased productive tillers/m row length. No significant variation in grain and straw yield was observed due to 22.5 and 30.0 cm row spacing, though the growth and yield attributes were numerically superior in 22.5 cm row spacing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and straw yields of rainfed wheat were maximum at 125 kg seed/ha.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
125 kg seed/hae1
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse1
Direction
maximume1
Qualifier
mainly due to increased productive tillers/m row lengthe2
Setting
Sagar (M.P.)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in clay loam soils at Sagar (M.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain and straw yields were maximum with 125 kg seed/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“mainly due to increased productive tillers/m row length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and straw yield of rainfed wheat did not differ significantly between 22.5 and 30.0 cm row spacing.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
22.5 and 30.0 cm row spacinge3
Outcome
grain and straw yielde3
Direction
No significant variatione3
Setting
Sagar (M.P.)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in clay loam soils at Sagar (M.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“No significant variation in grain and straw yield was observed due to 22.5 and 30.0 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield attributes of rainfed wheat were numerically superior at 22.5 cm row spacing.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Treatment
22.5 cm row spacinge4
Outcome
growth and yield attributese4
Direction
superiore4
Qualifier
numericallye4
Setting
Sagar (M.P.)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in clay loam soils at Sagar (M.P.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“the growth and yield attributes were numerically superior in 22.5 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–508 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.