Paper · 1990 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use

M Stapper; RA Fischer

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
150
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sowing date, sowing rate and row spacing effects were studied on irrigated wheat crops at Griffith, N.S.W. during 1983-85 using genotypes differing in maturity, stature and genetic background. The aim was to identify better management practices and genotypes through a better understanding of development and growth of wheat grown under high-yielding conditions. Maximum yield was up to 891 g/m2. The average yield reduction was 50 g/m2 or 6% per 1-week delay in anthesis after 1 October, but varied between 2 and 23%, depending on the season. Lodging was a significant problem in all three years, with less lodging for later sowing dates, earlier maturity types or shorter stature. Plant spacing, through variations in row spacing (17-45 cm) or sowing rate (50-200 kg/ha) did not significantly affect grain yields, but lodging was reduced by increased row spacing and reduced sowing rate. Dry weight at anthesis (600-1 500 g/m2) explained 65% of the variation in lodging, with severe lodging risks for weights over 900 g/m2. Harvest index improved with later sowing or earlier maturity and was, among genotypes within a sowing, negatively correlated with anthesis date, height, lodging score and final leaf number on the main stem. Nitrogen uptake usually ceased before anthesis. Genotypic differences in grain protein concentrations of more than 2% were found. Some genotypes combined high yield with high grain protein concentration (e.g. 717 g/m2, 14.1% protein). Significant genotype effects on spike density, kernel weight, kernel growth rate, and number of kernels per m2, per spike and per g chaff weight were identified, but none seemed to restrict yield. There was much compensation between traits. For example, high kernel numbers (per g chaff, spike or m2) were associated with low kernel weights and vice versa, both within and between genotypes. It was concluded that short-stature, early-maturing, low spike-bearing cultivars are most suited to high-yielding conditions from any sowing date, provided flowering occurs after late September, as such crops have a reduced lodging risk and use assimilates and N most efficiently. Genotypes were highly adaptable and many morphogenetic traits differed widely between genotypes, but were usually similar among dwarf or semidwarf, and among early or late maturing genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum wheat yield reached 891 g/m2.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
891 g/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield was up to 891 g/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–396 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each one-week delay in anthesis after 1 October reduced yield by 50 g/m2 or 6% on average.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50 g/m2 or 6%e0
Qualifier
varied between 2 and 23%, depending on the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield reduction was 50 g/m2 or 6% per 1-week delay in anthesis after 1 October, but varied between 2 and 23%, depending on the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging was less frequent with later sowing dates.

Treatment
later sowing datese0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less lodging for later sowing dates, earlier maturity types or shorter stature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier maturity types had less lodging.

Material
earlier maturity typese0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less lodging for later sowing dates, earlier maturity types or shorter stature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shorter stature was linked to less lodging.

Material
shorter staturee0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less lodging for later sowing dates, earlier maturity types or shorter stature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing changes did not significantly affect grain yield.

Treatment
Plant spacinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant spacing, through variations in row spacing (17-45 cm) or sowing rate (50-200 kg/ha) did not significantly affect grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing row spacing reduced lodging.

Treatment
increased row spacinge0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lodging was reduced by increased row spacing and reduced sowing rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing sowing rate reduced lodging.

Treatment
reduced sowing ratee0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lodging was reduced by increased row spacing and reduced sowing rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthesis dry weight explained 65% of lodging variation.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
variation in lodginge0
Value
65%e0
Qualifier
weights over 900 g/m2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight at anthesis (600-1 500 g/m2) explained 65% of the variation in lodging, with severe lodging risks for weights over 900 g/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index improved with later sowing or earlier maturity.

Treatment
later sowinge0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index improved with later sowing or earlier maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was negatively correlated with anthesis date, height, lodging score and final main-stem leaf number.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
Harvest indexe1
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negatively correlated with anthesis date, height, lodging score and final leaf number on the main stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Harvest index improved with later sowing or earlier maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake usually ceased before anthesis.

Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
ceasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake usually ceased before anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed by more than 2% in grain protein concentration.

Outcome
grain protein concentrationse0
Value
more than 2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypic differences in grain protein concentrations of more than 2% were found.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some genotypes combined high yield and high grain protein concentration.

Outcome
high yield with high grain protein concentratione0
Value
717 g/m2, 14.1% proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some genotypes combined high yield with high grain protein concentration (e.g. 717 g/m2, 14.1% protein).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected spike density, kernel weight, kernel growth rate and kernel counts.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
spike density, kernel weight, kernel growth rate, and number of kernels per m2, per spike and per g chaff weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant genotype effects on spike density, kernel weight, kernel growth rate, and number of kernels per m2, per spike and per g chaff weight were identified, but none seemed to restrict yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1664 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher kernel numbers were associated with lower kernel weights.

Organ / stage
kernele0
Outcome
kernel weightse0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
high kernel numberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high kernel numbers (per g chaff, spike or m2) were associated with low kernel weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that short, early maturing, low spike-bearing cultivars suit high-yielding conditions when flowering follows late September.

Outcome
short-stature, early-maturing, low spike-bearing cultivars are most suited to high-yielding conditionse0
Qualifier
provided flowering occurs after late Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“short-stature, early-maturing, low spike-bearing cultivars are most suited to high-yielding conditions from any sowing date, provided flowering occurs after late September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2053 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed widely in morphogenetic traits, though dwarf or semidwarf and early or late maturity groups were usually similar internally.

Material
Genotypese0
Outcome
morphogenetic traitse0
Direction
differed widelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes were highly adaptable and many morphogenetic traits differed widely between genotypes, but were usually similar among dwarf or semidwarf, and among early or late maturing genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2141–2332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.