Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo shucai

Effects of Mixing Peanut Chaff Substrate on the Growth and Quality of Tomato Plug Seedlings

Hongli Yang; Wang ZiChong; Zhang ShenPu; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of seven mixing peanut chaff substrate treatments on tomato seedlings was studied in the paper.The results showed that the substrate's composition of peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 V was an appropriate match.The 6 indexes of this treatment as:stem diameter,plant height,stem and leaf fresh weight,stem and leaf dry weight,root dry weight and strong seedling index were higher than that of the other 6 treatments and were significantly higher than that of the control(peat:vermiculite=2 V:1 V).The leaf chlorophyll content was not significantly different with that of the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 6:2:2 peanut chaff, cattle manure and slag mixture was identified as appropriate.

Treatment
peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 Ve0
Outcome
appropriate matche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substrate's composition of peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 V was an appropriate match”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 6:2:2 mixture increased tomato seedling diameter, height and stem and leaf fresh weight relative to the other six treatments and peat–vermiculite control.

Treatment
peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 Ve1
Outcome
stem diameter,plant height,stem and leaf fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control(peat:vermiculite=2 V:1 V)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 6 indexes of this treatment as:stem diameter,plant height,stem and leaf fresh weight,stem and leaf dry weight,root dry weight and strong seedling index were higher than that of the other 6 treatments and were significantly higher than that of the control(peat:vermiculite=2 V:1 V)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–515 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 V”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture increased stem and leaf dry weight, root dry weight and strong seedling index relative to control.

Treatment
peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 Ve1
Outcome
stem and leaf dry weight,root dry weight and strong seedling indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control(peat:vermiculite=2 V:1 V)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem and leaf dry weight,root dry weight and strong seedling index were higher than that of the other 6 treatments and were significantly higher than that of the control(peat:vermiculite=2 V:1 V)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–515 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 V”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content did not differ significantly from control.

Treatment
peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 Ve1
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf chlorophyll content was not significantly different with that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“peanut chaff:cattle manure:slag= 6 V:2 V:2 V”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–76 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 84 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.