Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Cold storage influences the postharvest pericarp browning and quality of litchi.

Ahmad Sattar Khan; Naveed Ahmad; Aman Ullah Malik; et al.

18
claims
42
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Occurrence of postharvest pericarp browning and rapid decay limit the postharvest storage life of litchi fruit. Effect of low temperature storage on the physico-chemical characteristics of two commercial litchi cultivars ‘Bedana’ and ‘Serai’ stored at 5°C for 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days were investigated. Incidence of pericarp browning, disease severity and fruit physicochemical characteristics were determined immediately after each removal. During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased, whereas fruit pericarp browning index (0.33‒3.25), postharvest disease index (0.5‒2.4) and fruit cracking (0.08‒1.16%) increased. Fruit weight loss, pericarp browning and disease severity were higher in ‘Serai’ than ‘Bedana’ fruit. The fruit of cv. ‘Bedana’ showed better aril: stone ratio (23.07), firmness (2.1 N), pH (4.15), SSC (19.04%), TA (0.14%), total sugars (12.11%) and ascorbic acid (44.8 mg 100 g) contents than ‘Serai’. Fruit flavour, texture and aroma changed rapidly during cold storage in ‘Serai’ than ‘Bedana’. The pH of fruit juice showed slightly increasing trend during the whole span of storage, while SSC (20.4‒17.4%), TA (0.23‒0.05%), ascorbic acid (55‒32.8 mg 100g), total sugars (13.5‒10.5%) and phenolics (0.71‒0.45 μg 100 g) showed decreasing trend. Litchi cv. ‘Bedana’ exhibited higher total phenolic contents (0.71 μg 100 g) than ‘Serai’ (0.55 μg 100 g). The fruit of cv. ‘Bedana’ were found superior having less weight loss, pericarp browning index and disease severity index, with higher aril: stone ratio, flavour, texture, aroma, pH, SSC, TA, ascorbic acid, total sugars and phenolic contents. Results suggest that postharvest pericarp browning and fruit quality deterioration can be delayed by cold storage. © 2012 Friends Science Publishers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage decreased fruit firmness in litchi, from 15 to 5.1 N.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15‒5.1 Ne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage decreased fruit weight loss in litchi, from 7.06 to 1.92%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
7.06‒1.92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage decreased the aril:stone ratio of litchi fruit, from 15.3 to 11.7.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
aril: stone ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.3‒11.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage decreased sensory values of litchi fruit.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
sensory values of fruite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage increased pericarp browning index of litchi, from 0.33 to 3.25.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
pericarp browning indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.33‒3.25e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas fruit pericarp browning index (0.33‒3.25), postharvest disease index (0.5‒2.4) and fruit cracking (0.08‒1.16%) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage increased the postharvest disease index of litchi, from 0.5 to 2.4.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
postharvest disease indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.5‒2.4e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas fruit pericarp browning index (0.33‒3.25), postharvest disease index (0.5‒2.4) and fruit cracking (0.08‒1.16%) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage increased fruit cracking of litchi, from 0.08 to 1.16%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee0
Outcome
fruit crackinge1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.08‒1.16%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage fruit firmness (15‒5.1 N), weight loss (7.06‒1.92%), aril: stone ratio (15.3‒11.7) and sensory values of fruit decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas fruit pericarp browning index (0.33‒3.25), postharvest disease index (0.5‒2.4) and fruit cracking (0.08‒1.16%) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serai fruit had higher weight loss, pericarp browning and disease severity than Bedana fruit.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Seraie2
Outcome
Fruit weight loss, pericarp browning and disease severitye2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
Bedanae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Fruit weight loss, pericarp browning and disease severity were higher in ‘Serai’ than ‘Bedana’ fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bedana fruit had a better aril:stone ratio (23.07) than Serai fruit.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Bedanae3
Outcome
aril: stone ratioe3
Direction
bettere3
Value
23.07e3
Qualifier
firmness (2.1 N)e3
Comparator
Seraie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The fruit of cv. ‘Bedana’ showed better aril: stone ratio (23.07), firmness (2.1 N), pH (4.15), SSC (19.04%), TA (0.14%), total sugars (12.11%) and ascorbic acid (44.8 mg 100 g) contents than ‘Serai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bedana fruit had a better pH (4.15) than Serai fruit.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Bedanae3
Outcome
pHe3
Direction
bettere3
Value
4.15e3
Qualifier
SSC (19.04%), TA (0.14%)e3
Comparator
Seraie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The fruit of cv. ‘Bedana’ showed better aril: stone ratio (23.07), firmness (2.1 N), pH (4.15), SSC (19.04%), TA (0.14%), total sugars (12.11%) and ascorbic acid (44.8 mg 100 g) contents than ‘Serai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bedana fruit had better total sugars (12.11%) than Serai fruit.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Bedanae3
Outcome
total sugarse3
Direction
bettere3
Value
12.11%e3
Qualifier
ascorbic acid (44.8 mg 100 g)e3
Comparator
Seraie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The fruit of cv. ‘Bedana’ showed better aril: stone ratio (23.07), firmness (2.1 N), pH (4.15), SSC (19.04%), TA (0.14%), total sugars (12.11%) and ascorbic acid (44.8 mg 100 g) contents than ‘Serai’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bedana fruit had higher total phenolic contents (0.71 μg 100 g) than Serai fruit (0.55 μg 100 g).

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Bedanae7
Outcome
total phenolic contentse7
Direction
highere7
Value
0.71 μg 100 ge7
Comparator
Seraie7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Litchi cv. ‘Bedana’ exhibited higher total phenolic contents (0.71 μg 100 g) than ‘Serai’ (0.55 μg 100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavour, texture and aroma of Serai litchi changed more rapidly than in Bedana during cold storage.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Material
Seraie4
Treatment
cold storagee4
Outcome
Fruit flavour, texture and aromae4
Direction
changed rapidlye4
Comparator
Bedanae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Fruit flavour, texture and aroma changed rapidly during cold storage in ‘Serai’ than ‘Bedana’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pH of litchi juice showed a slightly increasing trend during storage.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
storagee5
Outcome
pH of fruit juicee5
Direction
increasing trende5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The pH of fruit juice showed slightly increasing trend during the whole span of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSC of litchi juice showed a decreasing trend during storage, from 20.4 to 17.4%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
storagee5
Outcome
SSCe6
Direction
decreasing trende6
Value
20.4‒17.4%e6
Qualifier
TA (0.23‒0.05%)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The pH of fruit juice showed slightly increasing trend during the whole span of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1200 · show in text ↑
e6

“SSC (20.4‒17.4%), TA (0.23‒0.05%), ascorbic acid (55‒32.8 mg 100g), total sugars (13.5‒10.5%) and phenolics (0.71‒0.45 μg 100 g) showed decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid of litchi juice showed a decreasing trend during storage, from 55 to 32.8 mg 100g.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
storagee5
Outcome
ascorbic acide6
Direction
decreasing trende6
Value
55‒32.8 mg 100ge6
Qualifier
total sugars (13.5‒10.5%)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The pH of fruit juice showed slightly increasing trend during the whole span of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1200 · show in text ↑
e6

“SSC (20.4‒17.4%), TA (0.23‒0.05%), ascorbic acid (55‒32.8 mg 100g), total sugars (13.5‒10.5%) and phenolics (0.71‒0.45 μg 100 g) showed decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolics of litchi juice showed a decreasing trend during storage, from 0.71 to 0.45 μg 100 g.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
storagee5
Outcome
phenolicse6
Direction
decreasing trende6
Value
0.71‒0.45 μg 100 ge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The pH of fruit juice showed slightly increasing trend during the whole span of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1200 · show in text ↑
e6

“SSC (20.4‒17.4%), TA (0.23‒0.05%), ascorbic acid (55‒32.8 mg 100g), total sugars (13.5‒10.5%) and phenolics (0.71‒0.45 μg 100 g) showed decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage delays postharvest pericarp browning and fruit quality deterioration in litchi, according to the authors.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
cold storagee1
Outcome
postharvest pericarp browning and fruit quality deterioratione1
Direction
delayede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results suggest that postharvest pericarp browning and fruit quality deterioration can be delayed by cold storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1825 · show in text ↑
t0

“quality of litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑

cold · disease · LitchiPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.