Paper · 2015 · European Journal of Agronomy

The intercropping common bean with maize improves the rhizobial efficiency, resource use and grain yield under low phosphorus availability

Mourad Latati; Adnane Bargaz; Baroudi Belarbi; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
182
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In order to better understand how mixed crop cultures mitigate stressful conditions, this study aims to highlight the beneficial effect of the intercropping legume-cereal in enhancing soil phosphorus (P) availability for plant growth and productivity in a P-deficient soil of a northern Algerian agroecosystem. To address this question, common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. El Djadida) and maize ( Zea mays L. cv. Filou), were grown as sole- and inter-crops in two experimental sites; S1 (P-deficient) and S2 (P-sufficient) during two growing seasons (2011 and 2012). Growth, nodulation and grain yield were assessed and correlated with the rhizosphere soil P availability. Results showed that P availability significantly increased in the rhizosphere of both species, especially in intercropping under the P-deficient soil conditions. This increase was associated with high efficiency in use of the rhizobial symbiosis (high correlation between plant biomass and nodulation), plant growth and resource (nitrogen (N) and P) use efficiency as indicated by higher land equivalent ratio (LER > 1) and N nutrition index (for maize) in intercropping over sole cropping treatments. Moreover, the rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomass were positively correlated ( r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.01 and r 2 = 0.62, p < 0.01) in the intercropped common bean grown in the P-deficient soil during 2011 and 2012. The increased P availability presumably improved biomass and grain yield in intercropping, though it mainly enhanced grain yield in intercropped maize. Our findings suggest that modification in the intercropped common bean rhizosphere-induced parameters facilitated P uptake, plant biomass and grain yield for the intercropped maize under P-deficiency conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased rhizosphere P availability for common bean under P-deficient soil conditions.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
P availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P availability significantly increased in the rhizosphere of both species, especially in intercropping under the P-deficient soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly increased rhizosphere P availability for maize under P-deficient soil conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
P availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P availability significantly increased in the rhizosphere of both species, especially in intercropping under the P-deficient soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping was associated with more effective rhizobial symbiosis, measured by biomass-nodulation correlation.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
high correlation between plant biomass and nodulatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase was associated with high efficiency in use of the rhizobial symbiosis (high correlation between plant biomass and nodulation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had a higher land equivalent ratio than sole cropping, above one.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
LER > 1e0
Comparator
sole cropping treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher land equivalent ratio (LER > 1) and N nutrition index (for maize) in intercropping over sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped maize had a higher N nutrition index than sole-cropped maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
N nutrition indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole cropping treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher land equivalent ratio (LER > 1) and N nutrition index (for maize) in intercropping over sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomass were positively correlated in intercropped common bean in 2011.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomasse0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
r 2 = 0.71e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomass were positively correlated ( r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.01 and r 2 = 0.62, p < 0.01) in the intercropped common bean grown in the P-deficient soil during 2011 and 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomass were positively correlated in intercropped common bean in 2012.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomasse0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
r 2 = 0.62e0
Qualifier
2012e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere P availability and nodule biomass were positively correlated ( r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.01 and r 2 = 0.62, p < 0.01) in the intercropped common bean grown in the P-deficient soil during 2011 and 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased P availability presumably improved biomass in intercropping.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Qualifier
presumablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased P availability presumably improved biomass and grain yield in intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased P availability presumably improved grain yield in intercropping, mainly for maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
presumablye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased P availability presumably improved biomass and grain yield in intercropping, though it mainly enhanced grain yield in intercropped maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean with maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole cropping treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1177 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

67 papers: 37 positive, 30 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 122 positive, 19 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.