Paper · 1982

Biochemical Changes in Phaseolus and Sorghum Grown Under Different Light Intensities

P. Sampath; G. Kulandaivelu

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biochemicel changes, in Phaseolus and Sorghum grown under different light intensities. Sampath. P and Kulandaivelu, C (Plant Physiology Lab. School of Blological Sciences, Madurai Kamraj University, Madurai 625021 India). Plant Physiol. SI Biochern. 9(2): 60.67, 1982. Effect of decreasing the light intensity to 33': and 9: of full sunlight on leaf mass accumulation and hiochen~icalc onstitutents has becn investigated i n a typical C3 (P~LISCOImIIuPn ro L.)a nd Cc (Sorghunm vulgure L.) species. Progressive decrease in the light intensity during growth brought about parallel change in the leaf mass accumulation as evidenced by lower fresh and dry weight per unit leaf arm. Analysis of biochemical constituents revealed drastic changes in the protein content and Increased starch hydrolytic activity. Contrary to most of the biochemical constituents, the pigment content increased with a decrease in the light intensity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light reduced fresh and dry leaf mass per unit leaf area in Phaseolus.

Taxon
PhaseolusPhaseolust0
Treatment
decrease in the light intensitye0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight per unit leaf arme0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus
Phaseolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progressive decrease in the light intensity during growth brought about parallel change in the leaf mass accumulation as evidenced by lower fresh and dry weight per unit leaf arm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity changes altered leaf protein content in Phaseolus.

Taxon
PhaseolusPhaseolust0
Outcome
drastic changes in the protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus
Phaseolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of biochemical constituents revealed drastic changes in the protein content and Increased starch hydrolytic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light increased starch hydrolytic activity in Phaseolus.

Taxon
PhaseolusPhaseolust0
Outcome
Increased starch hydrolytic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus
Phaseolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of biochemical constituents revealed drastic changes in the protein content and Increased starch hydrolytic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light increased pigment content in Phaseolus.

Taxon
PhaseolusPhaseolust0
Treatment
decrease in the light intensitye0
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus
Phaseolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pigment content increased with a decrease in the light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light reduced fresh and dry leaf mass per unit leaf area in Sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
decrease in the light intensitye0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight per unit leaf arme0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progressive decrease in the light intensity during growth brought about parallel change in the leaf mass accumulation as evidenced by lower fresh and dry weight per unit leaf arm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity changes altered leaf protein content in Sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
drastic changes in the protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of biochemical constituents revealed drastic changes in the protein content and Increased starch hydrolytic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light increased starch hydrolytic activity in Sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Increased starch hydrolytic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of biochemical constituents revealed drastic changes in the protein content and Increased starch hydrolytic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower light increased pigment content in Sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
decrease in the light intensitye0
Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pigment content increased with a decrease in the light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑

light · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.