Paper · 2000 · HortScience

232 Inverse Day/Night Temperature Influences Yield and Canopy Height of Hydroponically Grown Sweetpotato

D.G. Mortley; J.H. Hill; C.K. Bonsi; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Growth chamber studies were conducted to determine if inverse day/night temperature could control canopy height of sweetpotato without adversely affecting storage root yield. Four 15-cm-long vine cuttings of TU-82-155 sweetpotato were grown in rectangular nutrient film technique hydroponic troughs for 120 days. Two troughs were placed into each of six reach-in growth chambers and subjected to 24/18, 26/20, 28/22, 18/24, 20/26, and 22/28 °C, respectively. Growth chamber conditions included a 12/12-h photoperiod, 70% RH, and photosynthetic photon flux of 1000 μmol·m -2 ·s -1 at canopy level. Total and edible storage root yields were reduced by 50% among plants grown under cool days/warm nights regimes. Harvest index was similar among treatments except for the low value obtained at 22/28 °C. Canopy height was positively correlated with the change in temperature, and for every 2 °C decrease there was a 3.1 centimeter decrease in canopy height. Inverse day/night temperature effectively controlled canopy height but at the expense of storage root production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cool days and warm nights reduced total storage-root yield by 50%.

Treatment
cool days/warm nights regimese0
Outcome
Totale0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total and edible storage root yields were reduced by 50% among plants grown under cool days/warm nights regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cool days and warm nights reduced edible storage-root yield by 50%.

Treatment
cool days/warm nights regimese0
Outcome
edible storage root yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total and edible storage root yields were reduced by 50% among plants grown under cool days/warm nights regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–708 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was similar across treatments except for a low value at 22/28 °C.

Treatment
22/28 °Ce0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index was similar among treatments except for the low value obtained at 22/28 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–798 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy height was positively correlated with temperature change.

Treatment
change in temperaturee0
Outcome
Canopy heighte0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Canopy height was positively correlated with the change in temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–870 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 2 °C decrease corresponded to a 3.1 cm decrease in canopy height.

Treatment
2 °C decreasee0
Outcome
canopy heighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
3.1 centimetere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“for every 2 °C decrease there was a 3.1 centimeter decrease in canopy height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–952 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inverse day-night temperature controlled canopy height at the expense of storage-root production.

Treatment
Inverse day/night temperaturee0
Outcome
canopy heighte0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Inverse day/night temperature effectively controlled canopy height but at the expense of storage root production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1066 · show in text ↑