Paper · 1990 · Annals of Botany

Carbohydrate, Nitrogen and Dry Matter Accumulation and Partitioning of Maize Hybrids Under Drought Stress

JAMES R. FREDERICK; FREDERICK E. BELOW; JOHN D. HESKETH

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress depends to some extent upon a hybrid's capacity to produce and translocate assimilate to its developing kernels during the stress period and/or after the stress is relieved. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in carbon and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning under drought stress among maize hybrids that differ in yield potential and/or physiological metabolism during reproductive development. The hybrids B73 × LH38, FS854, B73×Mol7 and US13 were subjected to drought stress from the 7th leaf stage until pollination was completed, at which time the soil of the stressed plots was replenished with water. For d. wt and chemical constituent determinations, plants of each hybrid were harvested from the irrigated and drought stressed plots at silking, mid-grain fill, and physiological maturity. Averaged over hybrids, vegetative biomass at silking was reduced 25% as a result of the drought stress treatment, with B73 × LH38 and FS854 accumulating more total biomass during the later portion of grain fill than the other two hybrids under both soil moisture treatments. At silking, the total non-structural carbohydrate content of the hybrids' vegetative tissue was not changed as a result of drought stress, whereas their reduced nitrogen (N) contents were decreased by an average of 33%. B73 × LH38 and FS854 had greater grain carbohydrate and reduced N contents under irrigation and smaller decreases in those variables as a result of soil moisture deficit than did the other two hybrids. These results indicate that the greater drought tolerance of B73 × LH38 and FS854 to stress imposed during vegetative and early reproductive development resulted from their more active N uptake and assimilation and sugar production during the later portion of grain fill and from their more efficient partitioning of assimilate to the developing kernels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced vegetative biomass at silking by 25% in maize

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Organ / stage
silkinge1
Treatment
drought stress treatmente1
Outcome
vegetative biomass at silkinge1
Direction
reducede1
Value
25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“vegetative biomass at silking was reduced 25% as a result of the drought stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress did not change the total non-structural carbohydrate content of maize vegetative tissue at silking

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Organ / stage
silkinge2
Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
total non-structural carbohydrate contente2
Direction
not changede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“At silking, the total non-structural carbohydrate content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1208 · show in text ↑
e3

“was not changed as a result of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased reduced nitrogen contents of maize vegetative tissue at silking by an average of 33%

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
reduced nitrogen (N) contentse4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
33%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“was not changed as a result of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1288 · show in text ↑
e4

“their reduced nitrogen (N) contents were decreased by an average of 33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1369 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids B73 × LH38 and FS854 had greater grain carbohydrate and reduced N contents under irrigation

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Material
B73 × LH38 and FS854e5
Treatment
under irrigatione5
Outcome
grain carbohydrate and reduced N contentse5
Direction
greatere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“B73 × LH38 and FS854 had greater grain carbohydrate and reduced N contents under irrigation and smaller decreases in those variables as a result of soil moisture deficit than did the other two hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids B73 × LH38 and FS854 showed smaller decreases in grain carbohydrate and reduced N contents under soil moisture deficit than the other two hybrids

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Material
B73 × LH38 and FS854e5
Treatment
soil moisture deficite5
Outcome
decreases in those variablese5
Direction
smallere5
Comparator
the other two hybridse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“B73 × LH38 and FS854 had greater grain carbohydrate and reduced N contents under irrigation and smaller decreases in those variables as a result of soil moisture deficit than did the other two hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids B73 × LH38 and FS854 accumulated more total biomass during the later portion of grain fill than the other two hybrids under both soil moisture treatments

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Material
B73 × LH38 and FS854e6
Treatment
both soil moisture treatmentse6
Outcome
total biomass during the later portion of grain fille6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
the other two hybridse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“B73 × LH38 and FS854 accumulating more total biomass during the later portion of grain fill than the other two hybrids under both soil moisture treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1149 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater drought tolerance of hybrids B73 × LH38 and FS854 is attributed to more active N uptake and assimilation

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Material
B73 × LH38 and FS854e7
Outcome
drought tolerancee7
Qualifier
more active N uptake and assimilatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“These results indicate that the greater drought tolerance of B73 × LH38 and FS854 to stress imposed during vegetative and early reproductive development resulted from their more active N uptake and assimilation and sugar production during the later portion of grain fill and from their more efficient partitioning of assimilate to the developing kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1926 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater drought tolerance of maize hybrids B73 × LH38 and FS854 is attributed to more efficient partitioning of assimilate to the developing kernels

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayse0
Outcome
drought tolerancee7
Qualifier
more efficient partitioning of assimilate to the developing kernelse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“These results indicate that the greater drought tolerance of B73 × LH38 and FS854 to stress imposed during vegetative and early reproductive development resulted from their more active N uptake and assimilation and sugar production during the later portion of grain fill and from their more efficient partitioning of assimilate to the developing kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1926 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.