Abstract
In the years 1999-2001 two-factor fi eld experiments were carried out in which the effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, elements of the structure of yield and the yield were investigated.The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad.The statistical analysis of the results showed signifi cant effects of years and sprouting damage on fi eld emergence in all the years.Consequently, these factors affected the number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000).In those years the decrease in yield, in the case of seeds with the most severe sprouting damage, ranged from 29% to 65% as compared with the control.In the favourable year 2001, in spite of a signifi cant effect of seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, the emergence level was so high that no decrease in the investigated elements of the structure of yield and the yield was observed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Seed sprouting damage significantly affected spring triticale field emergence in all years.
- Taxon
- spring triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- sprouting damagee1
- Outcome
- fi eld emergencee1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence”
e1“signifi cant effects of years and sprouting damage on fi eld emergence in all the years”
Claim · model-written summary
In the unfavourable years, the most severely sprouting-damaged seeds of spring triticale decreased yield by 29% to 65% compared with the control.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- seeds with the most severe sprouting damagee3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- decreasee3
- Value
- 29% to 65%e3
- Qualifier
- the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000)e2
- Comparator
- controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence”
e2“these factors affected the number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000)”
e3“In those years the decrease in yield, in the case of seeds with the most severe sprouting damage, ranged from 29% to 65% as compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
In the favourable year 2001, seed sprouting damage caused no decrease in spring triticale yield despite its significant effect on field emergence.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- seed sprouting damagee4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- no decreasee4
- Qualifier
- favourable year 2001e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence”
e4“In the favourable year 2001, in spite of a signifi cant effect of seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, the emergence level was so high that no decrease in the investigated elements of the structure of yield and the yield was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed sprouting damage affected the number of spikes per unit area and the weight of 1,000 seeds of spring triticale in the years unfavourable for emergence.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- sprouting damagee1
- Outcome
- number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seedse2
- Qualifier
- in the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000)e2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence”
e1“signifi cant effects of years and sprouting damage on fi eld emergence in all the years”
e2“these factors affected the number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000)”
The same questions in other papers
processing · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.