Paper · 2005 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

THE EFFECT OF SEED SPROUTING DAMAGE ON FIELD EMERGENCE AND YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE

Moś; Wójtowicz

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

In the years 1999-2001 two-factor fi eld experiments were carried out in which the effects of spring triticale seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, elements of the structure of yield and the yield were investigated. The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad. The statistical analysis of the results showed signifi cant effects of years and sprouting damage on fi eld emergence in all the years. Consequently, these factors affected the number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000). In those years the decrease in yield, in the case of seeds with the most severe sprouting damage, ranged from 29% to 65% as compared with the control. In the favourable year 2001, in spite of a signifi cant effect of seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, the emergence level was so high that no decrease in the investigated elements of the structure of yield and the yield was observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Years and seed sprouting damage had significant effects on field emergence of spring triticale in all years.

Taxon
SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Material
Gabo, Migo and Wanade3
Treatment
sprouting damagee1
Outcome
field emergencee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“The statistical analysis of the results showed signifi cant effects of years and sprouting damage on fi eld emergence in all the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–416 · show in text ↑
e3

“The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In years unfavourable for emergence, the most severely sprouting-damaged seeds decreased spring triticale yield by 29% to 65% compared with the control.

Taxon
SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Material
Gabo, Migo and Wanade3
Treatment
most severe sprouting damagee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
29% to 65%e2
Qualifier
In those yearse2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“the years which were unfavourable for emergence (1999, 2000). In those years the decrease in yield, in the case of seeds with the most severe sprouting damage, ranged from 29% to 65% as compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–741 · show in text ↑
e3

“The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Years and sprouting damage affected the number of spikes per unit area, the weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in years unfavourable for emergence.

Taxon
SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yielde5
Qualifier
in the years which were unfavourable for emergencee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“Consequently, these factors affected the number of spikes per unit area, weight of 1,000 seeds and the yield in the years which were unfavourable for emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the favourable year 2001, sprouting damage had no decrease effect on yield despite a significant effect on field emergence.

Taxon
SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Material
Gabo, Migo and Wanade3
Treatment
seed sprouting damagee4
Outcome
elements of the structure of yield and the yielde4
Direction
no decreasee4
Qualifier
In the favourable year 2001e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“YIELD OF SPRING TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the favourable year 2001, in spite of a signifi cant effect of seed sprouting damage on fi eld emergence, the emergence level was so high that no decrease in the investigated elements of the structure of yield and the yield was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–982 · show in text ↑
e3

“The research covered three cultivars: Gabo, Migo and Wanad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–280 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.