Paper · 2014 · Land Degradation and Development

Nursery‐Box Total Fertilization Technology (NBTF) Application for Increasing Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Chinese Irrigated Riceland: N–Soil Interactions

Aiping Zhang; Ji Gao; Ruliang Liu; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Abstract High N fertilizer and flooding irrigation applied to rice in anthropogenic‐alluvial soil often result in N leaching and low use efficiency of applied fertilizer N from the rice field in Ningxia irrigation region in the upper reaches of the Yellow River. Sound N management practices need to be established to improve N use efficiency while sustaining high grain yield levels and minimize fertilizer N loss to the environment. We investigated the effects of Nursery Box Total Fertilization technology (NBTF) on N leaching at different rice growing stages, N use efficiency and rice yield in 2010 and 2011. The four fertilizer N treatments were 300 kg N ha −1 (CU, Conventional treatment of urea at 300 kg N ha −1 ), 120 kg N ha −1 (NBTF120, NBTF treatment of controlled‐release N fertilizer at 120 kg N ha −1 ), 80 kgN ha −1 (NBTF80, NBTF treatment of controlled‐release N fertilizer at 80 kg N ha −1 ) and no N fertilizer application treatment (CK). The results showed that the NBTF120 treatment increased N use efficiency, maintained crop yields and substantially reduced N losses to the environment. Under the CU treatment, the rice yield was 9634 and 7098 kg ha −1 , the N use efficiency was 31·6% and 34·8% and the leaching losses of TN were 44·51 and 39·89 kg ha −1 ; NH 4 + ‐N was 5·26 and 5·49 kg ha −1 , and NO 3 − ‐N was 27·94 and 26·22 kg ha −1 during the rice whole growing period in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency and decreased the N losses from the paddy field. Under NBTF120, the N use efficiency was 56·3% and 51·4%, which was 24·7% and 16·6% higher than that of CU, and the conventional fertilizer application rate could be reduced by 60% without lowering the rice yield while decreasing the leaching losses of TN by 16·27 and 14·36 kg ha −1 , NH 4 + ‐N by 0·90 and 1·84 kg ha −1 , NO 3 − ‐N by 110·6 and 10·14 kg ha −1 in 2010 and 2011, respectively. Our results indicate that the CU treatment resulted in relatively high N leaching losses, and that alternative practice of NBTF which synchronized fertilizer application with crop demand substantially reduced these losses. We therefore suggest the NBTF120 be a fertilizer application alternative which leads to high food production but low environmental impact. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NBTF120 increased nitrogen use efficiency versus conventional urea.

Taxon
Ricelandt0
Treatment
NBTF120e0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CUe0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Riceland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBTF120 retained rice yield despite a 60% fertilizer rate reduction.

Treatment
conventional fertilizer application rate could be reduced by 60%e0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
without loweringe0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional fertilizer application rate could be reduced by 60% without lowering the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBTF120 reduced total nitrogen leaching by 16·27 and 14·36 kg per hectare in 2010 and 2011.

Treatment
NBTF120e1
Outcome
leaching losses of TNe0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
16·27 and 14·36e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaching losses of TN by 16·27 and 14·36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1826 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency and decreased the N losses from the paddy field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1551 · show in text ↑
e2

“without lowering the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBTF120 reduced ammonium nitrogen leaching by 0·90 and 1·84 kg per hectare.

Treatment
NBTF120e1
Outcome
NH 4 + ‐Ne0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
0·90 and 1·84 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NH 4 + ‐N by 0·90 and 1·84 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1873 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency and decreased the N losses from the paddy field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1551 · show in text ↑
e2

“without lowering the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBTF120 reduced nitrate nitrogen leaching by 110·6 and 10·14 kg per hectare.

Treatment
NBTF120e1
Outcome
NO 3 − ‐Ne0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
110·6 and 10·14 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
CUe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO 3 − ‐N by 110·6 and 10·14 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1876–1913 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with CU, NBTF120 significantly increased the N use efficiency and decreased the N losses from the paddy field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1551 · show in text ↑
e2

“without lowering the rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1764 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend NBTF120 as an alternative fertilizer practice.

Taxon
Ricelandt0
Outcome
NBTF120 be a fertilizer application alternativee0

Verbatim

e0

“We therefore suggest the NBTF120 be a fertilizer application alternative which leads to high food production but low environmental impact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Riceland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–130 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.