Paper · 2010 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Japanese Beetle Defoliation Reduces Primary Bud Cold Hardiness during Vineyard Establishment

Derrick L. Hammons; S. Kaan Kurtural; Daniel A. Potter

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines, but such effects have not previously been quantified for field-grown vines. The impact of Japanese beetle (JB) defoliation on midwinter primary bud cold hardiness of Norton, Chambourcin, and Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines was measured during the first two years of vineyard establishment. Effect on shoot length and periderm browning by late autumn was also evaluated for first-year vines. Three treatments were used to manipulate levels of defoliation: carbaryl applied either every 7 or every 14 days during the JB flight period (mid-June to mid-August) or no insecticide spray. Cuttings from dormant canes were subjected to a controlled freezing stress each February, and the temperature causing 50% lethal injury (LT50) to primary buds was compared among cultivars and treatments. All three cultivars sustained similar levels of JB defoliation, which ranged from light (3 to 8%), to moderate (13 to 26%), to severe (38 to 48%) under the 7-day, 14-day, and no-spray regimes, respectively. Norton and Chambourcin primary buds were more cold tolerant (i.e., had lower LT50) than Cabernet Sauvignon in both years. Japanese beetle defoliation of nonsprayed vines significantly reduced cold hardiness of all cultivars in one or both winters. Notably, biweekly cover sprays were as effective as weekly sprays in mitigating the adverse impact of JB defoliation on vine cold hardiness. Defoliation also reduced shoot length of first-year vines, and may be associated with earlier termination of late-season vine growth. The previously undocumented potential for JB injury to reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines exacerbates its impact as a serious vineyard pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Norton and Chambourcin primary buds were more cold tolerant than Cabernet Sauvignon in both years.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
Norton and Chambourcine5
Organ / stage
primary budse5
Outcome
LT50e5
Direction
lowere5
Qualifier
in both yearse5
Comparator
Cabernet Sauvignone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e5

“Norton and Chambourcin primary buds were more cold tolerant (i.e., had lower LT50) than Cabernet Sauvignon in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Japanese beetle defoliation of nonsprayed vines significantly reduced cold hardiness of all cultivars in one or both winters.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
Japanese beetle defoliatione2
Interactor
Japanese beetlePopillia japonicae2pest
Outcome
cold hardinesse2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
in one or both winterse2
Comparator
carbaryl applied either every 7 or every 14 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Popillia japonica
Popillia japonica · InteractorBruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“Three treatments were used to manipulate levels of defoliation: carbaryl applied either every 7 or every 14 days during the JB flight period (mid-June to mid-August) or no insecticide spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“Japanese beetle defoliation of nonsprayed vines significantly reduced cold hardiness of all cultivars in one or both winters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biweekly cover sprays were as effective as weekly sprays in mitigating the adverse impact of JB defoliation on vine cold hardiness.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
biweekly cover sprayse3
Interactor
JBe3pest
Outcome
vine cold hardinesse3
Direction
as effective ase3
Comparator
weekly sprayse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“biweekly cover sprays were as effective as weekly sprays in mitigating the adverse impact of JB defoliation on vine cold hardiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation reduced shoot length of first-year vines.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Organ / stage
first-year vinese4
Treatment
Defoliatione4
Outcome
shoot lengthe4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e4

“Defoliation also reduced shoot length of first-year vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was light (3 to 8%) under the 7-day regime.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
7-daye6
Interactor
JBe6pest
Outcome
JB defoliatione6
Value
3 to 8%e6
Qualifier
lighte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“All three cultivars sustained similar levels of JB defoliation, which ranged from light (3 to 8%), to moderate (13 to 26%), to severe (38 to 48%) under the 7-day, 14-day, and no-spray regimes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was moderate (13 to 26%) under the 14-day regime.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
14-daye6
Interactor
JBe6pest
Outcome
JB defoliatione6
Value
13 to 26%e6
Qualifier
moderatee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“All three cultivars sustained similar levels of JB defoliation, which ranged from light (3 to 8%), to moderate (13 to 26%), to severe (38 to 48%) under the 7-day, 14-day, and no-spray regimes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was severe (38 to 48%) under the no-spray regime.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Treatment
no-spraye6
Interactor
JBe6pest
Outcome
JB defoliatione6
Value
38 to 48%e6
Qualifier
severee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“All three cultivars sustained similar levels of JB defoliation, which ranged from light (3 to 8%), to moderate (13 to 26%), to severe (38 to 48%) under the 7-day, 14-day, and no-spray regimes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three cultivars sustained similar levels of Japanese beetle defoliation.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
All three cultivarse6
Interactor
JBe6pest
Outcome
similar levels of JB defoliatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect defoliation could reduce winter hardiness of young grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
e6

“All three cultivars sustained similar levels of JB defoliation, which ranged from light (3 to 8%), to moderate (13 to 26%), to severe (38 to 48%) under the 7-day, 14-day, and no-spray regimes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1059 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

48 papers: 29 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

pruning · tolerance: abiotic · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · tolerance: abiotic · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.